Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

A Common Marmoset Model of Mother-Infant Intervention for Breastfeeding Disorders in the Presence of Paternal Inhibition and Maternal Neglect
Published on: September 22, 2023
Weak and strong publics: drawing on Nancy Fraser to explore parental participation in neonatal networks
Andrew J Gibson1, Gillian Lewando-Hundt, Loraine Blaxter
1Research Fellow in Patient and Public Involvement, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter, UKProfessor, Institute of Health, University of Warwick, Coventry, UKSenior Research Fellow, Institute of Health, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Insights
Parental involvement in neonatal network boards is varied, but often remains a "weak public." Parent representatives have limited influence on decision-making processes in neonatal services.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Governance
- Public Health Policy
- Neonatal Care Management
Background:
- Growing emphasis on patient and public involvement in healthcare governance.
- Limited research on long-term patient involvement and its theoretical underpinnings in corporate decision-making.
- Need to understand the dynamics of parental engagement in specialized healthcare networks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze parental involvement in managed neonatal network boards using Nancy Fraser's concepts of weak and strong publics.
- To examine the nature and extent of parental representation on these boards.
- To theorize the process of patient and public involvement in healthcare decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Repeated surveys of neonatal network managers in England (2006-07).
- Case studies of four neonatal networks, including interviews with managers and parent representatives.
- Observation of meetings and analysis of board minutes to assess parental representation and influence.
Main Results:
- A diverse range of parental involvement strategies were identified across neonatal networks.
- Approaches varied from no parental involvement to structured systems linking parent representatives to neonatal unit parents.
- Parent representatives were found to have limited participation and influence on decision-making.
Conclusions:
- Parental participation in neonatal services currently exemplifies a 'weak public'.
- The limited influence of parent representatives restricts their ability to impact decisions within neonatal network boards.
- Further development is needed to strengthen parental influence and achieve more robust public involvement.
Aims:
We draw on the work of Nancy Fraser, and in particular her concepts of weak and strong publics, to analyze the process of parental involvement in managed neonatal network boards.
Background:
Public involvement has moved beyond the individual level to include greater involvement of both patients and the public in governance. However, there is relatively little literature that explores the nature and outcomes of long-term patient involvement initiatives or has attempted to theorize, particularly at the level of corporate decision making, the process of patient and public involvement.
Methods:
A repeated survey of all neonatal network managers in England was carried out in 2006-07 to capture developments and changes in parental representation over this time period. This elicited information about the current status of parent representation on neonatal network boards. Four networks were also selected as case studies. This involved interviews with key members of each network board, interviews with parent representatives, observation of meetings and access to board minutes.
Results:
Data collected show that a wide range of approaches to involving parents has been adopted. These range from decisions not to involve parents at this level to relatively well-developed systems designed to link parent representatives on network boards to parents in neonatal units.
Conclusion:
Despite these variations, we suggest that parental participation within neonatal services remains an example of a weak public because the parent representatives had limited participation with little influence on decision making.
Related Concept Videos
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative Parenting
This...
Parental Care
Relationship Formation
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings

