Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026
07:11
Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
Outcomes of usual chiropractic, harm & efficacy, the ouch study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Bruce F Walker1, Barrett Losco, Brenton R Clarke
1School of Chiropractic and Sports Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.
Trials
|November 2, 2011
Summary
This study compared chiropractic care to sham treatments for spinal pain. Chiropractic care showed similar adverse event rates and comparable efficacy to sham interventions for short-term spinal pain relief.
Area of Science:
- Chiropractic and Manual Therapies
- Clinical Trials
- Pain Management
Background:
- Previous research indicates adverse events occur with chiropractic treatment.
- Study designs have limited understanding of event frequency and severity compared to sham treatments.
- This study addresses the need for comparative data on chiropractic care's safety and efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the frequency and severity of adverse effects from short-term chiropractic spinal treatment versus sham treatment.
- To evaluate the efficacy of usual short-term chiropractic care for spinal pain compared to a sham intervention.
Main Methods:
- 180 participants with non-specific spinal pain were randomized to usual chiropractic care or a sham intervention.
- Participants received two treatments, with adverse events assessed via questionnaire.
- Efficacy was measured using validated scales for pain, function, and satisfaction at two-week follow-up.
- Blinding of participants, outcome assessors, and statisticians was maintained.
Main Results:
- Adverse event rates were comparable between the usual chiropractic care and sham intervention groups.
- No significant differences were observed in pain reduction or functional improvement between the groups.
- Patient satisfaction and minimum acceptable outcome measures also showed no significant divergence.
Conclusions:
- Short-term usual chiropractic care demonstrated a similar safety profile to sham treatment for spinal pain.
- The efficacy of short-term chiropractic care for spinal pain was not superior to sham intervention in this trial.
- Further research is warranted to explore long-term outcomes and specific chiropractic techniques.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:16Clinical Trials
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.