Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cell proliferation in carcinogenesis.

S M Cohen1, L B Ellwein

  • 1Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198.

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|August 31, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence and correction of near vision impairment at Kaski, Nepal.

Nepalese journal of ophthalmology : a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal of the Nepal Ophthalmic Society : NEPJOPH·2012
Same author

More Research Needed to Assess the Magnitude of Refractive Errors World-wide.

Community eye health·2007
Same author

Ethnicity-specific prevalences of refractive errors vary in Asian children in neighbouring Malaysia and Singapore.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2006
Same author

A population based eye survey of older adults in Tirunelveli district of south India: blindness, cataract surgery, and visual outcomes.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2002
Same author

A population-based eye survey of older adults in a rural district of Rajasthan: I. Central vision impairment, blindness, and cataract surgery.

Ophthalmology·2001
Same author

A population-based eye survey of older adults in a rural district of Rajasthan: II. Outcomes of cataract surgery.

Ophthalmology·2001
Same journal

Erratum for the Research Article "Detecting supramolecular organic nanoparticles during heat wave".

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Local signals, systemic decline.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

The mechanics of liver regeneration.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Computing in a memory with physics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Retraction.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Making time.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Many chemicals causing cancer in animals are not genotoxic but increase cell proliferation. This study shows increased cell proliferation explains their carcinogenicity, informing human risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology and Carcinogenesis
  • Computational Biology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Some high-dose animal carcinogens are not genotoxic, challenging traditional classification.
  • Nongenotoxic carcinogens often share the property of increasing target organ cell proliferation.
  • Understanding mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity is crucial for human health risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of increased cell proliferation in the carcinogenicity of nongenotoxic compounds.
  • To model the dose-response relationship for both genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemical carcinogens.
  • To determine the necessity of mechanistic data for threshold identification and human risk estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a biologically based, computerized model of carcinogenesis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed dose-response relationships for genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemicals.
  • Incorporated mechanistic information on cell proliferation and its link to cancer.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated that increased cell proliferation can fully account for the carcinogenicity of nongenotoxic compounds.
    • Found that increased cell proliferation also contributes to the carcinogenic dose-response of genotoxic chemicals.
    • Highlighted the importance of mechanistic data for establishing thresholds and estimating human exposure risks.

    Conclusions:

    • Increased cell proliferation is a key mechanism underlying the carcinogenicity of both genotoxic and nongenotoxic chemicals.
    • Mechanistic understanding, particularly regarding proliferative responses, is essential for accurate risk assessment of chemical exposures.
    • Further research is needed to establish thresholds for nongenotoxic chemical carcinogens and refine human risk evaluations.