Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026
09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
Uncertainty in macroeconomic policy-making: art or science?
David Aikman1, Philip Barrett, Sujit Kapadia
1Bank of England, UK.
Summary
Economic policy-making involves uncertainty due to unpredictable participant beliefs. This paper explores how central banks, like the Bank of England, communicate monetary policy amidst this complexity.
Area of Science:
- Economics
- Behavioral Economics
- Financial Stability
Background:
- Economic systems are complex and unpredictable, influenced by participant beliefs.
- Recent financial crises underscore the need for resilience against extreme, unpredictable events.
- Uncertainty in economic policy-making necessitates effective communication strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the role of participant beliefs in economic unpredictability.
- To highlight the importance of policy-maker communication in uncertain economic environments.
- To analyze the Bank of England's communication strategies for monetary policy.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of economic systems as complex adaptive systems.
- Review of financial crisis impacts on economic resilience.
- Case study of the Bank of England's communication practices.
Main Results:
- Economic outcomes are uniquely affected by the beliefs of system participants.
- Effective communication is crucial for managing uncertainty and fostering financial resilience.
- The Bank of England employs specific strategies to communicate monetary policy under uncertainty.
Conclusions:
- Acknowledging and communicating economic uncertainty is vital for policy effectiveness.
- Financial systems require enhanced resilience to unpredictable events.
- Central bank communication plays a critical role in navigating economic uncertainty.
Related Concept Videos
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
04:08The Uncertainty Principle
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He mathematically...
00:59Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
02:46Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...