Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dose-Dependent LET Constraints and Constraint Resolution for Interpreting Proton Therapy Toxicity.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same author

Experimentally determined proton discrete spot scanning time structures for an improved synchrotron-based PBS spot delivery time model.

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Parametric regression model approach for CT-based prediction of stopping power ratio for a Hounsfield look-up table.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2026
Same author

(Mis)trust among patients seeking unproven stem cell therapies: a qualitative analysis.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Mind Everywhere: A Framework for Conceptualizing Goal-Directedness in Biology and Other Domains-Part One.

Biological theory·2026
Same author

Mind Everywhere: A Framework for Conceptualizing Goal-Directedness in Biology and Other Domains-Part Two.

Biological theory·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Hype and public trust in science.

Zubin Master1, David B Resnik

  • 1Health Law and Science Policy Group, Rm 462, Law Centre, University of Alberta, 89 Avenue and 111 Street, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H5, Canada. zubin@zubsplace.com

Science and Engineering Ethics
|November 3, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Hype in biotechnology may negatively impact public trust and support for science. More empirical research is needed to understand this complex relationship and improve science communication.

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Science Communication
  • Public Trust in Science

Background:

  • Public trust in science is influenced by various factors, but the impact of biotechnology hype remains under-researched.
  • Scholarly claims suggest that overhyping biotechnology can lead to unmet public expectations, eroding trust and support for science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the need for empirical research examining the relationship between biotechnology hype, public trust, and public enthusiasm/support.
  • To discuss the challenges and potential solutions for designing studies to establish a causal link between hype and public trust.

Main Methods:

  • This study emphasizes the necessity of empirical investigation rather than detailing specific experimental procedures.
  • It proposes a framework for future research to address the complexities of measuring hype's impact on public perception.

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Main Results:

  • Conceptual arguments regarding hype and public trust require nuance based on empirical evidence.
  • The study identifies a gap in current understanding concerning the direct effects of biotechnology hype on public trust and enthusiasm.

Conclusions:

  • Further empirical research is crucial for refining our understanding of hype's influence on public trust in science.
  • Findings can inform better public communication strategies and evidence-based education on responsible research conduct for scientists.