Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease with stent implantation
Tita Butenko1, Darja Dobovšek, Luka Lipar
1Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Insights
Drug-eluting stents (DES) are more effective than bare metal stents (BMS) in preventing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after coronary interventions. Longer lesions treated with BMS may result in higher residual stenosis, impacting outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation is a primary treatment for coronary artery disease.
- Bare metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) are commonly used stent types.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of BMS in symptomatic coronary artery disease.
- To compare BMS with DES in preventing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) six months post-implantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 387 patients with BMS and 74 patients with DES.
- Efficacy assessed by residual in-stent stenosis.
- MACE defined as cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or target vessel revascularization.
Main Results:
- DES implantation showed significantly lower MACE incidence within six months compared to BMS.
- Longer lesions treated with BMS were associated with higher residual in-stent stenosis.
- Hypertension was the most common risk factor; AMI was the primary indication for BMS, while angina was for DES.
Conclusions:
- BMS is an effective treatment for symptomatic coronary artery disease.
- DES implantation is superior to BMS in preventing MACE.
- Longer lesions pose a challenge for BMS, leading to higher residual stenosis.
Background:
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation is the therapy of choice for treatment of decreased blood flow through the coronary arteries.
Aim:
We evaluated the efficacy of the bare metal stent (BMS) for treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease and compared BMS with the drug eluting stent (DES) to find out which one is better in the prevention of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) six months after stent implantation.
Materials And Methods:
Our retrospective analysis included 387 consecutive patients with BMS implantation and 74 consecutive patients with DES implantation. Efficacy of BMS was evaluated by residual in-stent stenosis after the procedure. According to the Taxus II-Trial definition, MACE include cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and target vessel revascularization; the latter includes PCI with stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft on previously revascularized vessel.
Results:
In BMS group mean pre-procedure stenosis diameter was 81.9 ± 12.8% and mean post-procedure stenosis was 4.8% ± 12.5%. The residual in-stent stenosis was significantly higher in patients with longer lesions (p<0.05). Hypertension was the most frequent risk factor in both groups and AMI the commonest indication for stent implantation in the group with BMS, while stable and unstable angina pectoris in the group with DES, respectively. During the first six months after the implantation of DES, the incidence of MACE was significantly lower (p<0.05) compared to BMS. The most frequent subgroup of MACE present in the group with BMS was cardiac death, and in the group with DES it was repeated PCI with stent implantation.
Conclusions:
BMS provides and efficacious choice of treatment for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Patients with longer lesions have higher residual in-stent stenosis after BMS implantation. Implantation of DES is more successful in preventing MACE in comparison with the implantation of BMS.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
