Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Targeting Biofilm Associated Staphylococcus aureus Using Resazurin Based Drug-susceptibility Assay
Published on: May 5, 2016
Retrospective case-control analysis of patients with staphylococcal infections receiving daptomycin or glycopeptide
Marco Falcone1, Alessandro Russo, Maria Elena Pompeo
1Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 37, Rome, Italy. marcofalc@libero.it
Abstract:
Glycopeptides have been considered the antimicrobials of choice for serious meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) infections for several years. Daptomycin is a new option for the treatment of these infections, including those exhibiting reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. The aim of this study was to compare glycopeptides and daptomycin for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA or MR-CoNS. Data for 106 patients with bloodstream infections (bacteraemia or infective endocarditis) or skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) were retrospectively reviewed, of which 43 were treated with daptomycin (DAP group) and 63 were treated with vancomycin or teicoplanin (GLYCO group). Patients included in the two comparison groups were homogeneous in terms of age, risk factors and clinical severity. Aetiology was mainly represented by MRSA in both groups, followed by various species of MR-CoNS. Daptomycin was used more frequently in patients with central venous catheter-associated bacteraemia or pacemaker-associated infection. Patients with SSTIs included in the GLYCO group had a longer mean duration of antibiotic therapy (18.2 days vs. 14.6 days; P=0.009) and a longer mean length of hospital stay (28.2 days vs. 19.6 days; P=0.01) compared with those included in the DAP group. A longer mean duration of antibiotic therapy was also observed in patients with bloodstream infections receiving glycopeptide therapy (25.6 days vs. 18 days; P=0.004). In conclusion, the good clinical efficacy of daptomycin is associated with a more rapid resolution of the clinical syndrome and a reduced length of hospitalisation. This latter aspect may have important pharmacoeconomic implications, promoting the use of daptomycin in the clinical setting.
Insights
Daptomycin offers effective treatment for serious infections caused by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS). This study found daptomycin led to faster recovery and shorter hospital stays compared to glycopeptides.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Glycopeptides (vancomycin, teicoplanin) are standard treatments for serious infections caused by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS).
- Emerging resistance to glycopeptides necessitates alternative therapeutic options.
- Daptomycin presents a newer alternative for treating these challenging Gram-positive bacterial infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical efficacy and outcomes of daptomycin versus glycopeptides for treating MRSA and MR-CoNS infections.
- To evaluate treatment duration and length of hospital stay in patients receiving daptomycin or glycopeptide therapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of data from 106 patients with bloodstream infections (bacteraemia, infective endocarditis) or skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs).
- Patients were divided into two groups: daptomycin (DAP group, n=43) and glycopeptides (GLYCO group, n=63, vancomycin or teicoplanin).
- Comparison of patient demographics, risk factors, clinical severity, aetiology, and treatment outcomes.
Main Results:
- Both daptomycin and glycopeptides were effective against MRSA and MR-CoNS infections.
- Patients treated with daptomycin experienced a shorter mean duration of antibiotic therapy and a shorter length of hospital stay compared to those on glycopeptides, particularly for SSTIs and bloodstream infections.
- Daptomycin was more frequently used in catheter-associated bacteraemia and pacemaker-associated infections.
Conclusions:
- Daptomycin demonstrates good clinical efficacy, comparable to glycopeptides, with the added benefit of more rapid clinical syndrome resolution.
- The reduced length of hospitalisation associated with daptomycin treatment has significant pharmacoeconomic implications.
- Daptomycin is a valuable therapeutic option for serious MRSA and MR-CoNS infections, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.
Related Concept Videos
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
