Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
The control dilemma in eating behavior: influence of temptation cues in restrained versus unrestrained eaters
María Angeles Peláez-Fernández1, Natalio Extremera
1Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain. mapelaez@uma.es
Abstract:
The present research explored the effects of pre-exposure to temptation primes and dieting primes on food intake, goal accessibility and explicit automatic evaluations of food-enjoyment and dieting goals among restrained and unrestrained eaters. Participants (n= 166) were randomly assigned to three conditions: food-cue, dieting, or control, in which they were exposed to incidental presentation of gourmet, fashion or geographic magazines, respectively. Words related to the goals of dieting and/or food- enjoyment were presented in a computer decision task following the incidental presentation of gourmet, dieting, and geographic magazine photographs. The computer task and the presentation of food were counterbalanced. Participants' food intake was assessed in a taste-rating task. Restrained eaters ate more than did unrestrained eaters across the three conditions. Restrained eaters who were exposed to food cues ate more than did restrained eaters in the control condition and they evaluated the goal of dieting more negatively compared to restrained eaters in the other two conditions. These findings were inconsistent with 'Counteractive Self-Control Theory' but consistent with previous studies on the effects of food-cue exposure in restrained eaters.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Regulation
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Binge Eating Disorders
Regulation of Food Intake
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

