Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 28, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

[Psychological variables in the control of brain-computer interfaces].

Leandro da Silva Sauer¹, Luis Valero Aguayo, Francisco Velasco Álvarez

¹E.T.S.I. Telecomunicación, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain. sauer@uma.es

|November 4, 2011

Summary

This study explored how imagination and anxiety affect brain-computer interface (BCI) control. Results indicated no significant psychological influence, but a new performance metric for BCI signal processing was identified.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

An experimental analysis of obsessive-compulsive checking as avoidance behaviour.

Psicothema·2014

Same author

[Treatment of a depressive disorder according to Functional Analytic Psychotherapy].

Psicothema·2010

Same author

[Contributions and novelties from Functional Analytic Psychotherapy].

Psicothema·2007

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Human-Computer Interaction
Cognitive Psychology

Context:

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) enable direct communication between the brain and external devices.
Electroencephalographic (EEG) signals are commonly analyzed for BCI control.
Understanding psychological influences on BCI performance is crucial for user adaptation and system refinement.

Purpose:

To investigate the impact of imaginative kinesthetic capacity and anxiety on BCI performance.
To identify potential psychological moderators affecting user interaction with EEG-based BCIs.
To explore novel quantitative parameters for evaluating BCI control efficacy.

Summary:

Participants (N=23) completed psychological assessments and a BCI task involving EEG signal control in a virtual car environment.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 28, 2026

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

The study analyzed the correlation between imaginative capacity, anxiety levels, and the ability to control BCI signals for left-right discrimination.

No statistically significant differences were found in BCI performance based on imagination or anxiety levels.

Impact:

The research introduces a novel quantitative parameter for assessing and comparing BCI performance, aiding in signal processing decision-making.
Findings contribute to the understanding of psychological factors in BCI use, suggesting current psychological variables may not significantly impede basic BCI control.
The study highlights the ongoing need for research into refining BCI control and the complex interplay between psychological and computational elements.