Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

07:37
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
Published on: August 1, 2017
[Psychological variables in the control of brain-computer interfaces]
Leandro da Silva Sauer1, Luis Valero Aguayo, Francisco Velasco Álvarez
1E.T.S.I. Telecomunicación, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain. sauer@uma.es
Psicothema
|November 4, 2011
Summary
This study explored how imagination and anxiety affect brain-computer interface (BCI) control. Results indicated no significant psychological influence, but a new performance metric for BCI signal processing was identified.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Cognitive Psychology
Context:
- Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) enable direct communication between the brain and external devices.
- Electroencephalographic (EEG) signals are commonly analyzed for BCI control.
- Understanding psychological influences on BCI performance is crucial for user adaptation and system refinement.
Purpose:
- To investigate the impact of imaginative kinesthetic capacity and anxiety on BCI performance.
- To identify potential psychological moderators affecting user interaction with EEG-based BCIs.
- To explore novel quantitative parameters for evaluating BCI control efficacy.
Summary:
- Participants (N=23) completed psychological assessments and a BCI task involving EEG signal control in a virtual car environment.
- The study analyzed the correlation between imaginative capacity, anxiety levels, and the ability to control BCI signals for left-right discrimination.
- No statistically significant differences were found in BCI performance based on imagination or anxiety levels.
Impact:
- The research introduces a novel quantitative parameter for assessing and comparing BCI performance, aiding in signal processing decision-making.
- Findings contribute to the understanding of psychological factors in BCI use, suggesting current psychological variables may not significantly impede basic BCI control.
- The study highlights the ongoing need for research into refining BCI control and the complex interplay between psychological and computational elements.

