Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Expressed sexual assault legal context and victim culpability attributions
Audrey K Miller1, Keith D Markman, Amanda M Amacker
1Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA. audrey.k.miller@shsu.edu
Abstract:
Legal scholars have argued that laws have an expressive function, specifically that sexual assault laws may convey social-level messages that victims are culpable for crimes against them. In a university sample, we conducted the first experimental test of legal scholars' proposal, hypothesizing that legal messages-specifically their clarity and effectiveness in conveying that sexual assault is a crime-affect victim culpability attributions. Results demonstrated that greater culpability was attributed to a victim of sexual assault within a context expressing unclear and ineffective sexual assault law than within a context clearly and effectively expressing that sexual assault is a crime. We also garnered empirical support for a mediation model, that is, negative affective reactions to a victim statistically accounted for the relationship between expressed legal context and victim culpability attributions. Implications for future psycholegal research and potential legal reforms are discussed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Torts II
Attribution Theory
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

