Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

Rarebit perimetry: normative values and test-retest variability.

Chee-Fang Chin1, Leonard W Yip, Danny C Sim

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore. chee_fang@yahoo.com

Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
|November 5, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes and Complications of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries (MIGS) in Primary Angle Closure and Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025
Same author

"Culture-positive exogenous endophthalmitis related to XEN45 gel stent implantation".

American journal of ophthalmology case reports·2022
Same author

Sustainable practice of ophthalmology during COVID-19: challenges and solutions.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2020
Same author

Efficacy of the XEN gel stent on intraocular pressure lowering in East Asian eyes.

International ophthalmology·2020
Same author

Comparison of Ethnic-specific Databases in Heidelberg Retina Tomography-3 to Discriminate Between Early Glaucoma and Normal Chinese Eyes.

The open ophthalmology journal·2017
Same author

Genome-wide association study identifies five new susceptibility loci for primary angle closure glaucoma.

Nature genetics·2016

Rarebit perimetry provides reliable visual field testing. This study establishes normative values for central and foveal fields, noting age-related decreases and potential clinical significance in central field test-retest variability.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Visual Science
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Establishing normative values for visual field tests is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring eye conditions.
  • Rarebit perimetry is a visual field testing method that requires normative data for accurate interpretation.
  • Understanding test-retest variability is essential for assessing the reliability of any diagnostic test.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish normative values for the central and foveal field tests of rarebit perimetry version 4.
  • To evaluate the test-retest variability of rarebit perimetry in normal subjects.
  • To determine if age influences rarebit perimetry results.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 54 normal subjects was conducted.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

  • Subjects underwent rarebit perimetry testing for central and foveal fields, repeating the test within one month.
  • Mean hit rates from one eye of each subject were analyzed.
  • Main Results:

    • Overall normative mean hit rates were 86.3% for the central field and 91.6% for the foveal field.
    • A 0.47% decrease in central mean hit rates was observed for each increasing year of age (P < 0.001).
    • No significant test-retest variability was found in the foveal field (P = 0.554), while the central field showed significant variability (P < 0.001) with a potentially clinically significant 3.5 unit increase.

    Conclusions:

    • Rarebit perimetry is a repeatable and reliable method for visual field testing.
    • Normative values for central and foveal fields have been established for two age groups.
    • The findings support the clinical utility of rarebit perimetry in assessing visual fields.