Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
New embolic protection devices: a review
1Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. sumaira.macdonald@nuth.nhs.uk
Insights
Embolic protection devices (EPDs) intuitively protect the brain during carotid artery stenting (CAS). While randomized trials are lacking, newer EPDs show promise in reducing microembolic events, enhancing procedural safety.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Neurology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a procedure to open blocked carotid arteries.
- Embolic protection devices (EPDs) are used during CAS to prevent debris from traveling to the brain.
- There is a lack of randomized trial evidence supporting EPD use in CAS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the newest embolic protection devices (EPDs) for carotid artery stenting (CAS).
- To discuss the philosophy, advantages, and clinical data of novel EPDs.
- To evaluate the impact of new EPDs on microembolic events during CAS.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and clinical data on embolic protection devices.
- Analysis of device capabilities in capturing macroemboli.
- Assessment of newer EPDs' influence on microembolic load during CAS.
Main Results:
- Existing EPDs have demonstrated the ability to capture macroemboli, suggesting brain protection during CAS.
- Newer EPDs have been developed to address limitations of earlier systems.
- Data on the impact of novel EPDs on microemboli during CAS is being gathered.
Conclusions:
- EPDs offer an intuitive layer of protection during CAS by capturing embolic material.
- Ongoing innovation in EPD technology aims to further minimize embolic risks.
- Further research is needed to fully elucidate the benefits of newer EPDs on microembolic outcomes.
Abstract:
The use of embolic protection (EPD) during carotid artery stenting (CAS) has always made intuitive sense. There is no randomized trial evidence in favour of the use of EPDs and this results from the statistical challenge posed when attempting to compare variations in technique based on the outcome measure all stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI) for a procedure such as CAS which, in experienced units, is associated with such a low baseline hazard. In order to detect a statistically meaningful difference between protected and unprotected populations, many thousands of patents would have to be recruited and this would entail a concerted effort amongst a population of physicians who are largely beyond uncertainty or equipoise regarding this particular issue. Accepting this, each type of device has been shown to capture macroemboli, implying, irrefutably, an added level of protection for the brain during CAS when EPDs are employed. Since their inception early in the last decade, the stenting community has been aware of the limitations of each type of system and accordingly, necessity has driven invention. This review seeks to present data on the newest EPDs, the philosophy behind them, their unique advantages, clinical data supporting their use and data highlighting the influence of these newer systems on the microembolic penalty of CAS, where available.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
