Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

08:48
Specificity Analysis of Protein Lysine Methyltransferases Using SPOT Peptide Arrays
Published on: November 29, 2014
Tuning HP1α chromodomain selectivity for di- and trimethyllysine
Robyn J Eisert1, Marcey L Waters
1Department of Chemistry, CB 3290, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Chembiochem : a European Journal of Chemical Biology
|November 5, 2011
Summary
Histone methylation state (di- vs. tri-methylation) is key for gene expression control. Mutations in the HP1α chromodomain reveal how proteins distinguish between these states, aiding cancer inhibitor development.
Area of Science:
- Epigenetics and Molecular Biology
- Protein-Protein Interactions
- Structural Biology
Background:
- Histone lysine methylation (mono-, di-, tri-) regulates gene expression by recruiting effector proteins.
- Dysregulation of histone methylation is linked to cancer, driving research into effector protein inhibitors.
- Understanding effector protein selectivity for different methylation states is crucial for therapeutic development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the mechanism of selectivity for histone lysine methylation states by the HP1α chromodomain.
- To elucidate the role of specific amino acid residues, particularly E52, in differentiating between H3K9Me2 and H3K9Me3 binding.
- To provide insights for guiding the development of targeted cancer therapies.
Main Methods:
- Site-directed mutagenesis of the Drosophila HP1α chromodomain at residue E52 (E52F, E52I, E52V, E52D, E52Q).
- Biochemical assays to measure binding affinities of wild-type and mutant proteins to dimethylated (H3K9Me2) and trimethylated (H3K9Me3) peptides.
- Comparative analysis of binding data to determine the impact of mutations on selectivity.
Main Results:
- The HP1α chromodomain binds H3K9Me2 and H3K9Me3 with similar affinities.
- Mutating E52 to glutamine (E52Q) significantly enhanced selectivity for H3K9Me3 over H3K9Me2.
- The E52Q mutant showed 3.5-fold weaker binding to H3K9Me2 (KD=52 μM) compared to H3K9Me3 (KD=15 μM).
Conclusions:
- Electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding at residue E52 are critical for differentiating histone methylation states.
- The findings offer a mechanistic understanding of methylation state recognition by effector proteins.
- This study provides valuable information for the rational design of inhibitors targeting cancer-associated epigenetic pathways.

