Temporary brittle bone disease: relationship between clinical findings and judicial outcome

Colin R Paterson1, Elizabeth A Monk

  • 1Late of Department of Medicine;

Pediatric Reports
|November 5, 2011
PubMed

Insights

Temporary brittle bone disease, a syndrome of infant fractures, presents similarly to non-accidental injury. Clinical findings in affected infants do not predict judicial outcomes, highlighting diagnostic challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Medical Genetics
  • Forensic Pediatrics

Background:

  • Unexplained fractures in infants have a broad differential diagnosis, including non-accidental injury, osteogenesis imperfecta, and vitamin D deficiency rickets.
  • A controversial syndrome, provisionally named temporary brittle bone disease, characterized by fractures in the first year of life, has been described.
  • Fractures associated with this syndrome, such as rib and metaphyseal fractures, were previously considered pathognomonic for non-accidental injury.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the clinical and radiological characteristics of infants with fractures.
  • To compare cases with judicial findings of abuse, parental exoneration, and no formal judicial findings.
  • To determine if clinical presentation can predict judicial outcomes in cases of suspected non-accidental injury versus temporary brittle bone disease.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 87 cases of infant fractures investigated between 1985 and 2000.
  • Analysis of clinical and radiological findings in 33 cases with judicial findings of abuse, 24 cases with parental exoneration, and 28 cases with no formal judicial finding.
  • Comparison of demographic data, age at fracturing, and fracture details across the three judicial outcome groups.

Main Results:

  • The three groups of patients (abuse, exonerated, no finding) showed remarkable similarities in demographics, age at fracturing, and fracture characteristics.
  • Despite clinical similarities, the judicial outcomes for these groups varied significantly.
  • This suggests that clinical and radiological findings alone are insufficient to differentiate between non-accidental injury and temporary brittle bone disease.

Conclusions:

  • Temporary brittle bone disease presents with fracture patterns that overlap significantly with those of non-accidental injury.
  • Clinical and radiological assessment alone cannot reliably distinguish between these conditions, leading to potential misdiagnosis and judicial complexities.
  • Further research is needed to establish definitive diagnostic criteria and improve the management of infants with unexplained fractures.