Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II01:23

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II

Establishing a secure, collaborative nurse-patient relationship is crucial for delivering high-quality care. This relationship, founded on trust, respect, and honesty, enhances the patient's comfort and willingness to share vital health information. For example, a nurse who listens actively and without judgment provides clear information about health conditions and treatment options and respects patient decisions, which builds a trusting relationship.
Communication between nurses and patients...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II01:09

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II

Professional accountability in nursing is a multifaceted concept that encompasses professional ethics, legal standards, and employment expectations. This framework ensures that nurses maintain and elevate the quality of care while upholding the values of their profession. It compels them to treat patients, families, and colleagues with respect, compassion, and integrity.
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide comfort...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I01:30

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

Accountability in nursing is a fundamental principle that underscores the obligation of nurses to take responsibility for their actions and answer for any errors or omissions in patient care. This principle is grounded in the professional, legal, and ethical frameworks that shape nursing practice. For instance, nurses must adhere to all relevant laws, regulations, and practice standards, including guidelines set forth by nursing boards and professional bodies, to ensure their actions comply...
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III01:16

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III

Nurse-to-nurse relationships are legally required to adhere to professional standards, ensuring a respectful and positive working environment. Professional conduct demands that nurses treat all colleagues respectfully and courteously, fostering a productive, supportive workplace. Nurses must actively eliminate bullying, discrimination, and harassment to maintain a safe and inclusive environment.
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dilemmas, decision-making, and ensuing consequences experienced by parents in the immediate aftermath of preverbal child sexual abuse by a daycare employee: A qualitative study.

Child abuse & neglect·2026
Same author

Adrift in life: A longitudinal qualitative study into the lived experience of persistent suicidality.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same author

A subtle association raising bigger questions: Implicit and explicit ageism in the Dutch age IAT.

Experimental gerontology·2025
Same author

Tug of War Over Power: A Case Study on the Development of Professional-Informal Caregiver Tensions in Residential Dementia Care.

Nursing inquiry·2025
Same author

Implementing Adjunct Trauma-Focused Imagery Rescripting in Inpatient Treatment for patients who are underweight with comorbid eating disorders and PTSD: Therapist Challenges and the Supporting Role of Peer Group Supervision.

Behaviour research and therapy·2025
Same author

Interprofessional Learning and Improving at the Paediatric Ward: A Participatory Action Research Practising Safety-II Theory.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Relational responsibilities in responsive evaluation.

Merel Visse1, Tineke A Abma, Guy A M Widdershoven

  • 1Department of Medical Humanities of the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands. m.visse@vumc.nl

Evaluation and Program Planning
|November 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a framework to help responsive evaluators navigate moral responsibilities in practice. It addresses challenges like balancing stakeholder demands and avoiding over- or under-identification for ethical evaluation.

More Related Videos

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Ethics
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Responsive evaluation involves partnerships with stakeholders.
  • Evaluators face ethical challenges like confidentiality, accountability, and privacy.
  • Specific responsibilities include including vulnerable groups and fostering dialogue.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance understanding of moral responsibilities in responsive evaluation.
  • To introduce an interpretive framework for ethical evaluation practice.
  • To support evaluators in managing their moral duties.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of moral responsibilities in responsive evaluation.
  • Introduction of an interpretive framework.
  • Illustration of arguments with a case study.

Main Results:

  • Responsive evaluation is a democratic, relational practice.
  • Evaluators face challenges with stakeholder identification and balancing demands.
  • Existing guidelines require situational interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework aids evaluators in understanding and handling moral responsibilities.
  • Addressing relational responsibilities is crucial in daily evaluation practice.
  • Novice evaluators need support in navigating complex stakeholder relationships.