Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Exploring the Longissimus Muscle: Unraveling its Correlation with Meat Quality in Bos indicus and Crossbred Bulls
Published on: July 12, 2024
Estimating beef carcass composition using the speed of ultrasound
C A Miles1, A V Fisher, G A Fursey
1AFRC Institute of Food Research, Bristol Laboratory, Langford, Bristol, Avon BS18 7DY, UK.
Abstract:
The reciprocal of the speed of 2·25 MHz (nominal) ultrasound (RV) was measured at selected sites through the soft tissues of 72 beef carcasses from Friesian. Hereford and Hereford × Friesian bulls and steers at or within 1 h of stunning. The measurement sites were: through M. adductor horizontal to the caudal edge of the symphysis pubis (S2), through M. scalenus just cranial to the first rib (S3) and through M. longissimus thoracis between the tenth and eleventh ribs, approximately 6 cm from the midline (S4). The thickness of extractable lipid (d(f)) at each site was defined as the product βd, where β was the volume fraction of extractable lipid and d was the tissue thickness. The thickness of lipid-free tissue (d(ff)) was defined as (d-d(f)) and β was calculated from the ultrasonic measurements using an empirical linear relation between β and RV. When cold, the intact sides were scored independently for fatness and conformation by two experienced judges according to the EAAP system and their mean scores determined. Sides were split at the level of the last rib and the depth of subcutaneous fat measured at 25%, 50% and 75% of the width of M. longissimus thoracis from the midline. The three ultrasonic characteristics (RV, d(f) and d(ff)) at each site, the mean fat depth and the mean fat and conformation scores were examined for correlation with % fat and % lean in the sides determined by complete physical dissection. The best predictors of % fat were mean d(f) at S3 and S4, mean d(f) at S2, S3 and S4 and mean EAAP fat score which were all of comparable precision (rsd, respectively, 2·07, 2·06 and 2·08). The best predictors of % muscle were mean d(f) at S3 and S4, mean d(f) at S2, S3 and S4 and mean RV at S2, S3 and S4 (rsd, respectively, 1·79, 1·79 and 1·90). The corresponding residual standard deviations for mean EAAP fat score and mean fat depth were 2·18 and 2·20.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...

