Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Untargeted Metabolomics from Biological Sources Using Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS)
Published on: May 20, 2013
Comparison of analytical methods
L Körmendy1, V Mihályi, E Zukál
1Hungarian Meat Research Institute, 1097 Budapest, Gubasci út 6/b, Hungary.
Abstract:
A technique for comparing two analytical methods is presented in this paper. Frequently a new method, generally simpler, faster or less expensive, is compared with a reference method. The deterministic relationships between two methods, subject only to random errors, is first discussed. However, the relationship between two methods may be stochastic (non-deterministic); this problem is also discussed here. The concept of the sensitivity ratio of Mandel furnishes an appropriate basis of comparison. The use of the correlation coefficient may be completely erroneous for this purpose. Tests are presented for the significance of constants in the regression equation. Dangers in the use of stochastic relationships are strongly emphasized because of the unstable estimation of constants in the regression formula. Some systematizing principles not generally known by food scientists are presented here.
Related Concept Videos
Development of Analytical Methods
Quantitative Analysis
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the method...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Overview
Bulk or large solid samples are typically reduced in size using grinding, crushing, or milling techniques to increase the...

