Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Exploring the Longissimus Muscle: Unraveling its Correlation with Meat Quality in Bos indicus and Crossbred Bulls
Published on: July 12, 2024
Evaluation of some objective methods for measuring pork quality
C Somers1, P V Tarrant, J Sherington
1Meat Research Department, An Foras Taluntais, Grange/Dunsinea Research Centre, Castleknock, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Abstract:
Several objective methods for estimating pork quality were evaluated, by correlating instrument values against visual scores by an experienced panel. The measurements examined were reflectance, fibre optic probe, pH, drip and Kapillarvolumeter values. Measurements were made on intact carcasses or after cutting across at the shoulder, mid-loin and ham. In chilled pork cuts, the fibre optic probe (FOP(u) value) and reflectometer agreed most closely with panel scores (r = 0·71 and 0·78, respectively). The probe has the added advantage of providing a useful indication of meat quality in the uncut carcass. Drip loss was about equally correlated with FOP(u), reflectance and Kapillarvolumeter values (r = 0·7 in all cases). In hot carcasses, the fibre optic probe (FOP(l) value) was superior to the pH(l) value for predicting panel score (r = 0·76 and -0·53 respectively) and reflectance (r = 0·80 and -0·60), whereas pH(l) was better than FOP(l) for predicting drip loss (r = -0·65 and 0·55).
Related Concept Videos
Quality Assurance
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods

