Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

10:05
Simultaneous Distinction of Monospecific and Mixed DFS70 Patterns During ANA Screening with a Novel HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70 Knockout Substrate
Published on: January 17, 2018
A novel automated indirect immunofluorescence autoantibody evaluation
Shaye Kivity1, Boris Gilburd, Nancy Agmon-Levin
1The Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Clinical Rheumatology
|November 8, 2011
Summary
An automated system for detecting autoantibodies (AAb) shows high accuracy in diagnosing autoimmune diseases. This automated indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method offers a reliable alternative to manual interpretation of antinuclear (ANA) and anticytoplasmic (ACyA) antibodies.
Area of Science:
- * Immunology and Diagnostics
- * Autoimmune Disease Biomarker Detection
Background:
- * Autoantibodies (AAb), including antinuclear (ANA) and anticytoplasmic (ACyA), are crucial for diagnosing autoimmune diseases.
- * Manual indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells is the standard but is time-consuming, costly, and prone to variability.
- * An automated IIF-HEp-2 reader has been developed to address these limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To evaluate the performance of an automated IIF-HEp-2 system for autoantibody detection.
- * To compare the automated system's accuracy against manual interpretation and routine immunoassays.
- * To assess the diagnostic potential of automated antinuclear and anticytoplasmic antibody interpretation.
Main Methods:
- * Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells was performed on 260 patient sera.
- * Samples included patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis/polymyositis, systemic sclerosis, rare AAb patterns, and healthy controls.
- * Comparison of a novel automated IIF-HEp-2 system (Aklides pattern recognition) with manual reading and immunodot assays.
Main Results:
- * Automated interpretation detected positive autoantibodies in 95-100% of rheumatic patients, compared to 74-100% for manual reading and 64-100% for immunodot assays.
- * High sensitivity and specificity were observed for the automated reading of autoantibodies.
- * Agreement between manual and automated interpretation ranged from 90% to 95% (kappa 0.554-0.69).
Conclusions:
- * The automated IIF-HEp-2 system demonstrates good correlation with manual interpretation for autoantibodies, including ANA and ACyA.
- * Full automation can minimize errors in ANA pattern interpretation, aiding standardization.
- * This technology offers a promising advancement for accurate and efficient autoimmune disease diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
A fluorescence microscope uses fluorescent chromophores called fluorochromes, which can absorb energy from a light source and then emit this energy as visible light. Fluorochromes include naturally fluorescent substances (such as chlorophylls) and fluorescent stains that are added to the specimen to create contrast. Dyes such as Texas red and FITC are examples of fluorochromes. Other examples include the nucleic acid dyes 4’,6’-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and acridine orange.
The...
The...
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
In 1971, Peter Perlman and Eva Engvall developed an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA or EIA). ELISA differs from western blot in that the assays are conducted in microtiter plates or in vivo rather than on an absorbent membrane.
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen. Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or quantified.
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen. Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or quantified.

