Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Exploring the Longissimus Muscle: Unraveling its Correlation with Meat Quality in Bos indicus and Crossbred Bulls
Published on: July 12, 2024
Determination of potential inherent variability when measuring beef quality.
D J O'Neill1, D J Troy, A M Mullen
1Teagasc, The National Food Centre, Ashtown, Castleknock, Dublin 15, Ireland.
Probe measurements for beef quality show that while muscle location has minimal impact, the type of pH meter and probe significantly influences pH and color readings. Optimal color assessment requires a 1-hour blooming time.
Area of Science:
- Food Science
- Meat Science
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- On-line probes offer rapid detection of beef quality attributes like color and tenderness.
- Evaluating sampling variability is crucial for optimizing probe-based quality measurements.
- The bovine M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) is a key muscle for assessing beef quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of sampling factors on pH and quality attributes in bovine LTL.
- To assess the influence of muscle location and probe type on beef quality measurements.
- To optimize sampling procedures for on-line probe measurements.
Main Methods:
- Measurements of pH, color, cook loss, Warner Bratzler shear force (WBSF), sarcomere length, moisture, and intramuscular fat.
- Comparison of different pH meter/probe models and their effect on readings.
- Evaluation of color measurements at various time points post-slaughter, including a 1-hour blooming period.
Main Results:
- Muscle location along the LTL did not significantly affect color, cook loss, WBSF, or sarcomere length.
- Intramuscular fat and moisture content showed minor variations with location, likely of no practical significance.
- Different pH meter/probe models significantly influenced pH readings (P⩽0.01), though pH did not vary along the muscle length (P⩾0.05).
- The type of meter significantly impacted color readings, with 1-hour blooming time identified as optimal.
Conclusions:
- Probe-based assessment of beef quality is feasible, but instrument choice is critical.
- Sampling location within the LTL has limited impact on most quality attributes measured.
- Standardizing probe/meter usage and implementing a 1-hour blooming period are recommended for consistent beef quality evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Interpreting X̄ Charts
An x̄ chart plots the values of individual measurements over time against control limits calculated from historical data. The central line represents the process mean,...
Standard Deviation of Calculated Results
A broad Gaussian distribution curve has a wider standard deviation, representing a data set with...

