Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Quantitating Iron Transport Across the Mouse Placenta In Vivo Using Nonradioactive Iron Isotopes
Published on: May 10, 2022
Iron-fortified vs low-iron infant formula: developmental outcome at 10 years
Betsy Lozoff1, Marcela Castillo, Katy M Clark
1Center for Human Growth and Development, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5406, USA. blozoff@umich.edu
Insights
Iron-fortified formula may negatively impact long-term child development, especially in infants with high hemoglobin levels. Further research is needed to determine optimal iron levels in infant formula for better developmental outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Developmental Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Infant formula iron fortification is a public health strategy to prevent iron deficiency anemia.
- The optimal iron concentration in infant formula for long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes remains under investigation.
- Previous studies have yielded mixed results regarding the effects of formula iron levels on cognitive and motor development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term developmental effects of iron-fortified versus low-iron infant formula.
- To assess cognitive and motor outcomes at 10 years of age in children who participated in a randomized controlled trial of formula iron levels.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial followed 473 children at age 10 years in urban Chile.
- Participants were previously assigned to receive either iron-fortified (12.7 mg/L) or low-iron (2.3 mg/L) formula from 6 to 12 months of age.
- Neurodevelopmental assessments included IQ, spatial memory, arithmetic achievement, visual-motor integration, visual perception, and motor functioning, with analyses considering baseline hemoglobin levels.
Main Results:
- Children receiving iron-fortified formula scored lower on all developmental measures compared to the low-iron group, with significant differences in spatial memory and visual-motor integration.
- Infants with high baseline hemoglobin levels (>12.8 g/dL) who received iron-fortified formula showed substantially poorer outcomes (10.7-19.3 points lower).
- Infants with low baseline hemoglobin levels (<10.5 g/dL) showed improved outcomes with iron-fortified formula, though effects were smaller.
Conclusions:
- High iron content in infant formula may adversely affect long-term neurodevelopment in infants with elevated hemoglobin levels.
- The findings suggest that current iron fortification levels may not be optimal for all infants.
- Further research is warranted to determine the ideal iron concentration in infant formula to support optimal child development.
Objective:
To assess long-term developmental outcome in children who received iron-fortified or low-iron formula.
Design:
Follow-up at 10 years of a randomized controlled trial (1991-1994) of 2 levels of formula iron. Examiners were masked to group assignment.
Setting:
Urban areas around Santiago, Chile.
Participants:
The original study enrolled healthy, full-term infants in community clinics; 835 completed the trial. At 10 years, 473 were assessed (56.6%).
Intervention:
Iron-fortified (mean, 12.7 mg/L) or low-iron (mean, 2.3 mg/L) formula from 6 to 12 months.
Main Outcome Measures:
We measured IQ, spatial memory, arithmetic achievement, visual-motor integration, visual perception, and motor functioning. We used covaried regression to compare iron-fortified and low-iron groups and considered hemoglobin level before randomization and sensitivity analyses to identify 6-month hemoglobin levels at which groups diverged in outcome.
Results:
Compared with the low-iron group, the iron-fortified group scored lower on every 10-year outcome (significant for spatial memory and visual-motor integration; suggestive for IQ, arithmetic achievement, visual perception, and motor coordination; 1.4-4.6 points lower; effect sizes, 0.13-0.21). Children with high 6-month hemoglobin levels (> 12.8 g/dL [to convert to grams per liter, multiply by 10]) showed poorer outcome on these measures if they received iron-fortified formula (10.7-19.3 points lower; large effect sizes, 0.85-1.36); those with low hemoglobin levels (< 10.5 g/dL) showed better outcome (2.6-4.5 points higher; small but significant effects, 0.22-0.36). High hemoglobin levels represented 5.5% of the sample (n = 26) and low hemoglobin levels represented 18.4% (n = 87).
Conclusion:
Long-term development may be adversely affected in infants with high hemoglobin levels who receive 12.7 mg/L of iron-fortified formula. Optimal amounts of iron in infant formula warrant further study.
Related Concept Videos
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Development of Human Microbiota
Teratogenicity

