Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
The difficulties of clinical trials evaluating therapeutic agents in patients with severe sepsis
T C Hall1, D K Bilku, D Al-Leswas
1Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK. tch2@doctors.org.uk
Introduction:
Although the pathophysiology of sepsis has been extensively studied, the disease remains a common cause of death in the critically ill patient. It thus remains one of the most pressing clinical and economic problems of modern medicine. A vast amount of inflammatory mediators have been identified as key factors in driving sepsis. Therapeutic agents designed to target these mediators have so far failed to demonstrate significant clinical benefit.
Methods:
Clinical trials are the standard for assessing safety and efficacy of novel agents but are made difficult by the heterogeneous nature of septic patients. This review aims to highlight the complex nature of sepsis and the inherent difficulties encountered in designing clinical trials in these patients. The major factors contributing to the difficulties in improving internal and external validity will be discussed with the aim of guiding future study design.
Conclusions:
The design of clinical trials on the septic patient remains a challenge. Methodology must be rigorous if seemingly positive clinical trials which are widely implemented are later discredited as a result of poor study design. Many lessons can be learnt from the study design of the PROWESS trial, however there remains room for improvement. This review serves as a stimulus and guide in motivating much needed high quality clinical trials in sepsis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
