Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

15:53
Cell Death Associated with Abnormal Mitosis Observed by Confocal Imaging in Live Cancer Cells
Published on: August 21, 2013
Hit clustering can improve virtual fragment screening: CDK2 and PARP1 case studies
Alexey A Zeifman1, Victor S Stroylov, Fedor N Novikov
1N D Zelinsky Institute Of Organic Chemistry (ZIOC RAS), Moscow, Russia.
Journal of Molecular Modeling
|November 10, 2011
Summary
Virtual fragment screening shows promise as an alternative to experimental methods. This study validates docking approaches and develops a new technique, leading to novel PARP1 inhibitors.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Drug discovery
- Structural biology
Background:
- Experimental fragment screening is costly and time-consuming.
- In silico methods for fragment screening require further validation.
- Accurate prediction of fragment binding is crucial for drug design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate existing molecular docking methods for predicting fragment binding.
- To develop a novel virtual fragment screening technique.
- To identify new drug scaffolds, specifically PARP1 inhibitors.
Main Methods:
- Validated Lead Finder docking software using experimental data.
- Analyzed docking of 68 fragments from PDB structures.
- Developed a virtual screening technique involving structural filtration and clustering.
Main Results:
- Achieved RMSD of 1.35 kcal/mol for binding energy prediction.
- Predicted binding poses within 1.5 Å of experimental ones.
- Successfully docked fragments involved in hydrogen bonds and metal coordination in 70-80% of cases.
- Identified two millimolar-scale PARP1 inhibitors with a novel scaffold.
Conclusions:
- Molecular docking can reliably predict fragment binding affinities and poses.
- The developed virtual fragment screening approach is effective for identifying novel inhibitors.
- This method holds potential for drug rediscovery and lead optimization.
Related Concept Videos
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Checkpoints throughout the cell cycle serve as safeguards and gatekeepers, allowing the cell cycle to progress in favorable conditions and slow or halt it in problematic ones. This regulation is known as the cell cycle control system.
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
The orderly progression of the cell cycle depends on the activation of Cdk protein by binding to its cyclin partner. However, the cell cycle must be restricted when undergoing abnormal changes. Most cancers correlate to the deregulated cell cycle, and since Cdks are a central component of the cell cycle, Cdk inhibitors are extensively studied to develop anticancer agents. For instance, cyclin D associates with several Cdks, such as Cdk 4/6, to form an active complex. The cyclin D-Cdk4/6 complex...
