Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

06:45
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Contrast class cues and performance facilitation in a hypothesis-testing task: evidence for an iterative
1University of Derby, Derby, UK.
Memory & Cognition
|November 10, 2011
Summary
Discovering rules in Wason's 2-4-6 task is challenging. Providing a contrasting example (MED) alongside the target rule (DAX) significantly improves hypothesis testing and rule discovery.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Decision Making
- Experimental Psychology
Background:
- Wason's 2-4-6 task demonstrates poor hypothesis-testing performance, with low success rates for discovering the 'ascending numbers' rule.
- Dual-goal (DG) task variants, requiring discovery of both a primary rule (DAX) and a secondary rule (MED), show enhanced solution rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of 'usefulness' of MED exemplars on DAX rule discovery in a dual-goal task.
- To determine if contrast-class information facilitates hypothesis testing in rule discovery tasks.
Main Methods:
- Conducted two experiments manipulating the usefulness of MED exemplars presented alongside the 2-4-6 DAX exemplar.
- Designed a third experiment to exclude the possibility of the MED triple directly providing the DAX rule.
Main Results:
- The usefulness of MED exemplars significantly facilitated the discovery of the DAX rule.
- This finding highlights the critical role of contrast-class information in effective hypothesis testing.
Conclusions:
- Contrast-class information is crucial for improving hypothesis testing and rule discovery.
- An extended iterative counterfactual model can explain the facilitation observed in dual-goal tasks.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Counterfactual Thinking
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Social Facilitation
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...

