Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial
Jianqiang Xu1, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn
1Division of Cardiology, Cardiac and Vascular Center, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50, Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Contrast-enhanced MRI reveals non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients have smaller infarct size and less microvascular obstruction than ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. These findings suggest more favorable outcomes for NSTEMI following early invasive intervention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Cardiac MRI
- Myocardial Infarction Pathophysiology
Background:
- Differences in clinical outcomes exist between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
- Understanding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms is crucial for targeted treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) findings between STEMI and NSTEMI patients.
- To elucidate the in vivo pathophysiological differences contributing to varied clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- CE-MRI was performed in 168 patients (113 STEMI, 55 NSTEMI) a median of 6 days post-event.
- Infarct size and area at risk (AAR) were quantified using delayed-enhancement and T2-weighted imaging, respectively.
- Microvascular obstruction and myocardial hemorrhage were also assessed.
Main Results:
- NSTEMI patients exhibited significantly smaller infarct size (10.7% vs. 19.2%) and lower microvascular obstruction (0% vs. 0.9%) compared to STEMI patients (P < 0.001).
- A trend towards greater myocardial salvage index was observed in NSTEMI (48.2% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.056), though similar in anterior infarctions.
- Myocardial hemorrhage was less frequent in NSTEMI (22.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.029).
Conclusions:
- CE-MRI demonstrates more favorable infarct size, AAR, myocardial salvage, and reperfusion injury in NSTEMI compared to STEMI patients undergoing early invasive intervention.
- Baseline Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 and hemorrhagic infarction are associated with STEMI.
- These findings highlight distinct in vivo pathophysiological characteristics influencing outcomes in different myocardial infarction types.
Abstract:
To define causes and pathological mechanisms underlying differences in clinical outcomes, we compared the findings of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). In 168 patients undergoing early invasive intervention for STEMI (n = 113) and NSTEMI (n = 55), CE-MRI was performed a median of 6 days after the index event. Infarct size was measured on delayed-enhancement imaging, and area at risk (AAR) was quantified on T2-weighted images. The median infarct size was significantly smaller in the NSTEMI group than in the STEMI group (10.7% [5.6-18.1] vs. 19.2% [10.3-30.7], P < 0.001). Although there was a trend toward a greater myocardial salvage index ([AAR - infarct size] × 100/AAR) in the NSTEMI group compared to the STEMI group (48.2 [30.4-66.8] vs. 40.5 [24.8-53.5], P = 0.056), myocardial salvage index was similar between the groups in patients with anterior infarction (39.6 [20.0-54.9] vs. 35.5 [23.2-53.4], P = 0.96). The NSTEMI group also had a significantly lower extent of microvascular obstruction and a smaller number of segments with >75% of infarct transmurality relative to the STEMI group (0% [0-0.6] vs. 0.9% [0-2.3], P < 0.001 and 3.0 ± 2.3 vs. 4.6 ± 2.9, P = 0.001, respectively). Myocardial hemorrhage was detected less frequently in the NSTEMI group than the STEMI group (22.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.029). In the multivariate analysis, baseline Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 and hemorrhagic infarction were closely associated with ST-segment elevation (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.81, P = 0.017; OR 5.66, 95% CI 1.77-18.12, P = 0.003, respectively). In conclusion, in vivo pathophysiological differences revealed by CE-MRI assessment include more favorable infarct size, AAR, myocardial salvage and reperfusion injury in patients with NSTEMI compared to those with STEMI undergoing early invasive intervention.
More Related Videos
09:59A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Stroke Onset Time Estimation in Permanent Cerebral Ischemia
Published on: September 16, 2017
12:24Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Abnormalities in Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis by Magnetic Resonance Microscopy Imaging in the Mouse
Published on: June 20, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
