Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
Published on: July 24, 2010
Probabilistic methods for verbal autopsy interpretation: InterVA robustness in relation to variations in a priori
Edward Fottrell1, Kathleen Kahn, Stephen Tollman
1Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Edward.Fottrell@epiph.umu.se
InterVA, a verbal autopsy (VA) tool, remains robust even with significant changes to its initial probability assumptions. This indicates its reliability for determining causes of death globally, especially where death certification is unavailable.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- InterVA is a probabilistic model for interpreting verbal autopsy (VA) data.
- It calculates causes of death based on reported symptoms and a priori probabilities.
- The study investigated the sensitivity of InterVA to variations in these probabilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of altering a priori probabilities on InterVA's interpretation of VA data.
- To determine if changes in probabilities affect the characterization of population mortality composition.
Main Methods:
- A priori probabilities in the InterVA model were systematically modified.
- Six model variants were created by altering 25% and 50% of probabilities by 1-3 logarithmic steps.
- 1,000 VA records from South Africa were analyzed using the original and modified InterVA models.
Main Results:
- Cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) remained functionally similar across all model variants.
- Even substantial variations in a priori probabilities did not lead to significantly different public health conclusions.
- The rank order of causes of death was consistent across all tested InterVA versions.
Conclusions:
- InterVA is a robust model for verbal autopsy data interpretation.
- Significant variations in a priori probabilities do not substantially alter InterVA-derived results.
- Physician-derived a priori probabilities are likely sufficient for global use of InterVA, particularly in areas lacking death certification.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

