Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
The neural coding of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes: dissociations between active and
C Bellebaum1, D Jokisch, E R Gizewski
1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neuropsychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany. christian.bellebaum@rub.de
Neural mechanisms for learning from monetary feedback differ between active and observational learning. While both involve prediction error (PE) processing, active learning emphasizes striatal and orbitofrontal cortex activity, whereas observational learning highlights hippocampal engagement.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Science
- Decision Making
Background:
- Environmental adaptation relies on learning stimulus-response-outcome associations.
- Learning can occur actively through trial and error or passively through observation.
- Understanding the neural basis of these distinct learning modes is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate similarities and differences in neural mechanisms between active and observational learning from monetary feedback.
- To compare brain activation patterns associated with expected and unexpected monetary outcomes in both learning types.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to study two groups of 15 participants each: active learners and observational learners.
- Active learners made choices and received monetary feedback; observational learners watched active learners' choices and outcomes.
- Learning performance was assessed using feedback-free test trials.
Main Results:
- Comparable learning performance was observed between active and observational learners.
- Distinct neural activation patterns emerged for processing unexpected versus expected monetary feedback, particularly for positive outcomes.
- Active learning showed greater right striatum activity for unexpected rewards, while observational learning exhibited enhanced bilateral hippocampal activity.
- Prediction error (PE) modulation was seen in the right putamen for both groups, with stronger PE-related activations in the right anterior caudate nucleus and medial orbitofrontal cortex for active learning.
Conclusions:
- The striatum and orbitofrontal cortex are more involved in linking reward stimuli to one's own actions compared to observing another person's actions.
- Neural mechanisms underlying active and observational learning from feedback show both shared and distinct patterns, particularly in reward processing and prediction error computation.
More Related Videos
08:05Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Purposive Learning
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Observational Learning
Hindsight Biases
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory