Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Counterintuitive Compatibilization of Poly(δ-valerolactone) and Poly(l‑lactic acid) by Statistical Copolymers toward Compostable and Recyclable Packaging.

ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering·2026
Same author

Mono-Materials Created by Engineering a Continuum of P3HB Stereomicrostructures in a One-Step Catalytic Process.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2025
Same author

Polyhydroxybutyrate laminated trilayer films with enhanced barrier and mechanical properties for active food packaging.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Text-to-image models reveal specific color-emotion associations.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Biobased Poly(dodecylene Furanoate) with Inherent Advantages in Performance and Circularity.

ChemSusChem·2025
Same author

Tunable and Degradable Dynamic Thermosets from Compatibilized Polyhydroxyalkanoate Blends.

ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
10:44

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies

Published on: July 1, 2016

Improving data quality on low level mercury wastewater analysis.

Patricia S Gillenwater1, Meltem Urgun-Demirtas, M Cristina Negri

  • 1Argonne National Laboratory Energy Systems Division, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA.

Journal of Environmental Monitoring : JEM
|November 15, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Analytical method improvements enhanced mercury (Hg) removal data for oil refinery wastewater. However, split-sample tests revealed significant differences between two certified laboratories, impacting data reliability.

More Related Videos

An Anaerobic Biosensor Assay for the Detection of Mercury and Cadmium
09:33

An Anaerobic Biosensor Assay for the Detection of Mercury and Cadmium

Published on: December 17, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
10:44

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies

Published on: July 1, 2016

An Anaerobic Biosensor Assay for the Detection of Mercury and Cadmium
09:33

An Anaerobic Biosensor Assay for the Detection of Mercury and Cadmium

Published on: December 17, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Wastewater Treatment

Background:

  • Oil refinery wastewater poses environmental risks due to low-level mercury contamination.
  • Accurate analytical methods are crucial for evaluating mercury removal treatability tests.
  • Existing mercury analytical methods may lack the sensitivity and precision required for complex wastewater matrices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare treatability test results for low-level mercury removal from oil refinery wastewater.
  • To assess the impact of improved mercury analytical methods on data reliability.
  • To identify discrepancies in mercury analysis between certified laboratories.

Main Methods:

  • Revisions were made to mercury analytical protocols at two US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certified laboratories.
  • Split-sample experiments were conducted to compare results from the two laboratories.
  • Mercury recoveries were analyzed to evaluate method performance.

Main Results:

  • Revised analytical protocols demonstrated improved mercury recoveries.
  • The enhanced methods enabled more reliable data interpretation for the specific wastewater.
  • Significant differences in results were observed between the two laboratories in the split-sample experiment.

Conclusions:

  • Improvements in mercury analytical methods enhance the reliability of treatability test data for oil refinery wastewater.
  • Despite methodological improvements, inter-laboratory variability remains a challenge for accurate mercury quantification.
  • Further standardization and validation of analytical methods are necessary for consistent mercury monitoring in industrial wastewater.