Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Typicality effects in artificial categories: is there a hemisphere difference?

L G Richards1, C Chiarello

  • 1Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, NY 13244-2340.

Brain and Language
|July 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ride Quality Evaluation II: Modelling of Airline Passenger Comfort.

Ergonomics·2015
Same author

Initial right hemisphere activation of subordinate word meanings is not due to homotopic callosal inhibition.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Reliability of upper extremity kinematics while performing different tasks in individuals with stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2011
Same author

Implicit learning of a motor skill after mild and moderate stroke.

Clinical rehabilitation·2006
Same author

Orthographic and phonological facilitation from unattended words: evidence for bilateral processing.

Laterality·2004
Same author

Inferring the nature of semantic processes by varying priming procedure: a reply to Koivisto and Laine.

Laterality·2004
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Category classification accuracy and reaction time are influenced by prototype distance. This study found similar typicality effects for verbal and nonverbal dot patterns, suggesting both brain hemispheres use prototype matching regardless of verbal labels.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human visual system

Background:

  • Typicality effects in category classification are well-documented, where performance metrics like accuracy and reaction time correlate with an item's similarity to a category prototype.
  • The role of verbal labels in category learning and classification strategies, particularly concerning hemispheric differences, remains an area of active research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether verbal labels influence category classification strategies within different cerebral hemispheres.
  • To compare typicality effects in both verbal and nonverbal dot pattern categories.
  • To determine if hemispheric processing differs based on the presence or absence of verbal category information.

Main Methods:

  • Participants learned either verbal or nonverbal dot pattern categories.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A lateralized classification task was administered to assess performance across visual fields (and thus, hemispheres).
  • Reaction times and classification accuracy were measured to evaluate typicality effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Comparable typicality effects were observed for both reaction time and accuracy in both verbal and nonverbal categories.
    • These effects were consistent across different visual fields, indicating similar processing in both hemispheres.
    • Evidence suggests both hemispheres employed a similarity-to-prototype matching strategy for classification.

    Conclusions:

    • The presence of verbal labels does not appear to fundamentally alter the classification strategy employed by either cerebral hemisphere.
    • Hemispheric processing in category classification relies on a shared similarity-to-prototype matching mechanism, irrespective of verbalization.
    • These findings contribute to understanding the neural basis of categorization and the integration of perceptual and semantic information.