Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026
Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
Published on: February 3, 2023
Feasibility of using a handheld electronic device for the collection of patient reported outcomes data from children
Lisa A Vinney1, John D Grade, Nadine P Connor
1Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Goodnight Hall, Madison, WI 53706, United States. vinney@wisc.edu
Insights
Collecting pediatric patient-reported outcomes using electronic devices is more efficient and just as reliable as paper forms. This technology aids in understanding how communication disorders impact children's quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health Outcomes Research
- Communication Sciences and Disorders
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Collecting pediatric quality of life (QOL) data is challenging with traditional paper methods.
- Limited research exists on using electronic devices for pediatric patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
- Communication disorders may affect children's health-related QOL, but data collection is hindered.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of electronic versus paper data collection for pediatric QOL.
- To assess the efficiency of handheld electronic devices for capturing PROs in children.
- To evaluate potential benefits of electronic data capture for children with speech or voice disorders.
Main Methods:
- A cross-over design was used to compare electronic and paper formats of the PedsQL 4.0 instrument.
- Participants included children with (n=9) and without (n=10) speech/voice disorders.
- Key metrics included completion time, response accuracy, reliability, and user preference.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found in children's scores or time to complete the measure between formats.
- The electronic device format resulted in significantly fewer answering errors or omissions compared to paper.
- Both children and parents found the electronic format easy to use.
Conclusions:
- Electronic data collection via handheld devices is a more efficient and equally feasible, reliable, and acceptable method for pediatric PROs compared to paper.
- This technology can overcome limitations of traditional data collection in pediatric QOL research.
- Further development of electronic tools for collecting QOL and PRO data in children with speech disorders is recommended.
Unlabelled:
The manner in which a communication disorder affects health-related quality of life (QOL) in children is not known. Unfortunately, collection of quality of life data via traditional paper measures is labor intensive and has several other limitations, which hinder the investigation of pediatric quality of life in children. Currently, there is not sufficient research regarding the use of electronic devices to collect pediatric patient reported outcomes in order to address such limitations. Thus, we used a cross-over design to compare responses to a pediatric health quality of life instrument (PedsQL 4.0) delivered using a handheld electronic device to those from a traditional paper form. Respondents were children with (n=9) and without (n=10) a speech or voice disorder. For paper versus the electronic format, we examined time to completion, number of incomplete or inaccurate question responses, intra-rater reliability, ease of use, and child and parent preference. There were no significant differences between children's scores, time to complete the measure, or ratings related to ease of answering questions. The percentage of children who made answering errors or omissions with paper and pencil was significantly greater than the percentage of children who made such errors using the device. This preliminary study demonstrated that use of an electronic device to collect QOL or patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data from children is more efficient than and just as feasible, reliable, and acceptable as using paper forms. The development of hardware and software applications for the collection of QOL and/or PRO data in children with speech disorders is likely warranted.
Learning Outcomes:
The reader will be able to understand: (1) The potential benefits of using electronic data capture via handheld devices for collecting pediatric patient reported outcomes; (2) The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 is a measure of the perception of general health quality that has distinguished between healthy children and those with chronic health conditions; (3) Past research in communication disorders indicates that voice and speech disorders may impact quality of life in children; (4) Based on preliminary data, electronic collection of patient reported outcomes in children with and without speech/voice disorders is more efficient and equally feasible, reliable, and acceptable when compared to paper forms.
