Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

The Supraclavicular Fossa Ultrasound View for Central Venous Catheter Placement and Catheter Change Over Guidewire
Published on: December 23, 2014
The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity
J Matthew Fields1, Anthony J Dean, Raleigh W Todman
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. matthewfields@gmail.com
Insights
Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter (USGPIV) longevity is poor in deep or proximal vessels. Careful vessel selection can improve USGPIV success and durability.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Vascular Access
- Ultrasound Guidance
Background:
- Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters (USGPIVs) demonstrate suboptimal durability.
- Predictors of USGPIV longevity require investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if vessel characteristics, including depth, diameter, and location, influence the longevity of USGPIVs.
- To identify factors associated with improved USGPIV survival rates.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of a prospectively gathered database of USGPIV placements.
- Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of catheter dwell times and reasons for removal.
- Inclusion of patients receiving 20-gauge, 48-mm catheters placed under ultrasound guidance.
Main Results:
- After 48 hours, 32% of USGPIVs failed prematurely; overall survival probability was 0.63.
- Survival was highest in shallow vessels (1.00) and lowest in deep vessels (0.29; P < .0001).
- Catheter survival was better in the antecubital fossa/forearm (0.83) compared to the brachial region (0.50; P = .0002). Vessel diameter did not impact longevity.
Conclusions:
- Cannulation of deep and proximal vessels is linked to diminished USGPIV survival.
- Strategic selection of target vessels can enhance the success and durability of USGPIV placement.
Introduction:
Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters (USGPIVs) have been observed to have poor durability. The current study sets out to determine whether vessel characteristics (depth, diameter, and location) predict USGPIV longevity.
Methods:
A secondary analysis was performed on a prospectively gathered database of patients who underwent USGPIV placement in an urban, tertiary care emergency department. All patients in the database had a 20-gauge, 48-mm-long catheter placed under ultrasound guidance. The time and reason for USGPIV removal were extracted by retrospective chart review. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.
Results:
After 48 hours from USGPIV placement, 32% (48/151) had failed prematurely, 24% (36/151) had been removed for routine reasons, and 44% (67/151) remained in working condition yielding a survival probability of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.70). Survival probability was perfect (1.00) when placed in shallow vessels (<0.4 cm), moderate (0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.71) for intermediate vessels (0.40-1.19 cm), and poor (0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.51) for deep vessels (≥1.2 cm); P < .0001. Intravenous survival probability was higher when placed in the antecubital fossa or forearm locations (0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91) and lower in the brachial region (0.50; 95% CI, 0.38-0.61); P = .0002. The impact of vessel depth and location was significant after 3 hours and 18 hours, respectively. Vessel diameter did not affect USGPIV longevity.
Conclusion:
Cannulation of deep and proximal vessels is associated with poor USGPIV survival. Careful selection of target vessels may help improve success of USGPIV placement and durability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

