Interpretability and importance of functionals in competing risks and multistate models
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Per Kragh Andersen1, Niels Keiding
1Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. p.k.andersen@biostat.ku.dk
Abstract:
The basic parameters in both survival analysis and more general multistate models, including the competing risks model and the illness-death model, are the transition hazards. It is often necessary to supplement the analysis of such models with other model parameters, which are all functionals of the transition hazards. Unfortunately, not all such functionals are equally meaningful in practical contexts, even though they may be mathematically well defined. We have found it useful to check whether the functionals satisfy three simple principles, which may be used as criteria for practical interpretability.
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...
