Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Implicit Personality Theories01:23

Implicit Personality Theories

Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
Trait Centrality01:21

Trait Centrality

Trait centrality refers to the degree to which a particular characteristic influences the overall impression of an individual. Some traits exert a disproportionately strong impact on perception, shaping how people interpret other attributes of a person. Solomon Asch first systematically studied this phenomenon in 1946.Asch’s Experiment on Trait CentralityAsch's seminal study demonstrated the centrality of certain traits through a controlled experiment. Participants were presented with a list of...
Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter more...
Trait Theory by Gordon Allport01:20

Trait Theory by Gordon Allport

Gordon Allport, often regarded as the father of American personality psychology, developed a theory that emphasized the importance of understanding people in their present lives rather than focusing on their past, as psychoanalysis did. Allport believed that personality should be studied in healthy, well-adjusted individuals rather than those with psychological problems. He was particularly interested in defining traits, which he saw as fundamental mental structures that guide behavior across...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extending ecological affordance theory to late adulthood.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Are Mediterranean Societies "Cultures of Honor?": Prevalence and Implications of a Cultural Logic of Honor Across Three World Regions.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Fundamental social motives in men and women across 42 societies.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Honour, competition and cooperation across 13 societies.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Crowdsourcing multiverse analyses to explore the impact of different data-processing and analysis decisions: A tutorial.

Psychological methods·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Social class differences in N400 indicate differences in spontaneous trait inference.

Michael E W Varnum1, Jinkyung Na, Asuka Murata

  • 1Department of Psychology, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Beijing, China. michael.e.w.varnum@gmail.com

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|November 16, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Socioeconomic background influences spontaneous trait inference. Middle-class individuals show automatic trait judgments, while working-class individuals do not, suggesting differences in how social behaviors are processed.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization
12:00

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Published on: November 19, 2014

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization
12:00

Investigating the Effects of Antipsychotics and Schizotypy on the N400 Using Event-Related Potentials and Semantic Categorization

Published on: November 19, 2014

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Emerging research suggests socioeconomic status impacts causal attribution of social behavior.
  • Previous studies indicate dispositional bias is weaker in working-class individuals compared to middle-class individuals.
  • It remains unclear if this disparity extends to spontaneous trait inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether socioeconomic background influences spontaneous trait inference.
  • To examine the neural correlates of spontaneous trait inference across different socioeconomic groups.

Main Methods:

  • Participants (American undergraduates) memorized pairings of faces and trait-implying behaviors.
  • A lexical judgment task assessed spontaneous trait inference using event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically the N400 component.
  • Participants were categorized as middle-class (college-educated parents) or working-class (high-school-educated parents).

Main Results:

  • Middle-class participants exhibited a significant N400 effect, indicating spontaneous trait inference during memorization.
  • Working-class participants did not show a significant N400 effect, suggesting a lack of spontaneous trait inference.
  • The N400 spontaneous trait inference effect correlated with the perceived importance of dispositions in explaining social behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Socioeconomic background, specifically parental education, is associated with differences in spontaneous trait inference.
  • The findings suggest that middle-class individuals automatically infer traits from behaviors, while working-class individuals may not.
  • This difference in spontaneous trait inference may be linked to how individuals perceive the significance of dispositional factors in social cognition.