Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway01:29

Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway

Nasopharyngeal suctioning is a procedure to remove secretions from the upper part of the respiratory tract that the patient cannot clear independently. It helps maintain airway patency and prevents complications such as aspiration pneumonia.
Equipment Required
Nose and Nasal Cavity01:24

Nose and Nasal Cavity

The nose is composed of an observable exterior segment (external nose) and an internal segment within the skull known as the nasal cavity (internal nose). The external nose, visible on the face, consists of a framework of bone and hyaline cartilage enveloped in skin and muscle and lined with a mucous membrane. This structure is supported by the frontal bone, nasal bones, and maxillary bone and is supplemented by a cartilaginous framework comprising the septal nasal cartilage, lateral nasal...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trophoblast stem cells and syncytiotrophoblasts lack inflammatory responses to LPS but retain robust interferon-mediated antiviral immunity.

Reproduction & fertility·2026
Same author

Prospective Methodology Results in Higher Rates of Reported Complications Following Pediatric ACL Reconstruction.

Journal of pediatric orthopedics·2026
Same author

Anthropometric assessment of obesity in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A systematic review.

BJUI compass·2026
Same author

Electrocardiographic and Skin Manifestations of Turner Syndrome: Association With Cardiovascular Disease.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2026
Same author

Reprogramming T cell-myeloid crosstalk overcomes immune resistance in colorectal cancer.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Algorithm for Surgical Management of Temporal Migraine Headaches: A 25-Year Retrospective Observational Review.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Building Practical Artificial Intelligence Tools For The Plastic Surgeon: A Step-By-Step Guide To Cowork.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Interpretation Matters: Common Statistical Pitfalls in Retrospective Surgical Research.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

"Inferior Repositioning of the High-Riding Nipple Using a Parenchymal-Based Flap".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

A Four-Step Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Rhytids: A Focus on Upper Facial Wrinkles.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Long-Term Retention of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage Allograft in An Animal Model.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Manual extrusion of fat granules for primary thinning of a bulky flap.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

Defining the ideal nasolabial angle.

Bryan S Armijo1, Matthew Brown, Bahman Guyuron

  • 1Cleveland, Ohio From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|November 18, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study objectively defines the ideal nasolabial angle, finding a narrower aesthetic range (93.4-98.5° for men, 95.5-100.1° for women) than previously reported. The ideal angle for women is less obtuse than commonly believed.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Facial Aesthetics
  • Anatomy

Background:

  • The nasolabial angle, crucial in facial aesthetics, is typically cited as 90-120 degrees.
  • Previous definitions of the ideal nasolabial angle lack objective, data-driven consensus.
  • Understanding the ideal nasolabial angle is vital for rhinoplasty and facial reconstructive surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To objectively determine the ideal nasolabial angle for aesthetic facial harmony.
  • To challenge and refine the commonly accepted range for the nasolabial angle.

Main Methods:

  • Lateral photographs of 20 individuals post-rhinoplasty were digitally altered to vary the nasolabial angle.
  • Sixteen raters evaluated and selected the most aesthetically pleasing nasolabial angle from a range of 90-110 degrees.
  • Statistical analysis determined the mean preferred nasolabial angle for men and women.

Main Results:

  • The ideal nasolabial angle for men was determined to be 95.96° ± 2.57°, with an aesthetic range of 93.4° to 98.5°.
  • The ideal nasolabial angle for women was found to be 97.7° ± 2.32°, with an aesthetic range of 95.5° to 100.1°.
  • The study revealed a narrower and overlapping aesthetic range for men and women than previously documented.

Conclusions:

  • The ideal aesthetic nasolabial angle range is narrower and more similar between sexes than traditionally believed.
  • This research provides the first objective definition of the ideal aesthetic nasolabial angle.
  • The ideal nasolabial angle for women is less obtuse than previously reported in aesthetic literature.