Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles.
Jennifer P Wisdom1, Mary A Cavaleri, Anthony J Onwuegbuzie
1Psychiatry Department, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA. jpw2129@columbia.edu
Mixed methods research is underutilized in health services, with few articles employing this approach. Methodological rigor varies, highlighting a need for improved reporting standards in mixed methods studies.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Research Methodology
- Scientific Publication Analysis
Background:
- Mixed methods research offers a comprehensive understanding of health services, integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches.
- Assessing the methodological rigor of published research is crucial for advancing the field.
- The frequency and quality of mixed methods studies in health services research require examination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of mixed methods research in top-ranked health services journals.
- To compare the reporting of key methodological components indicative of rigor across mixed methods, qualitative, and quantitative articles.
- To identify areas for improvement in the transparency and reporting of mixed methods research.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive review of empirical articles published between 2003 and 2007 in four leading health services journals.
- Evaluation of 1,651 articles, including all 47 mixed methods articles and random samples of qualitative and quantitative articles.
- Application of established criteria to assess methodological rigor, focusing on quantitative, qualitative, and integration components.
Main Results:
- Mixed methods articles constituted a small fraction (2.85%) of the published health services research.
- Quantitative components were reported less frequently in mixed methods articles compared to purely quantitative ones (21.94% vs. 47.07%).
- No significant difference was found in the reporting of qualitative components between mixed methods and qualitative articles (21.34% vs. 25.47%).
Conclusions:
- The utilization of mixed methods research in health services publications is limited.
- There is variability in the reporting of essential methodological components across different research designs.
- Recommendations are proposed to enhance the transparency and rigor of mixed methods research reporting.
Related Concept Videos
Data Reporting and Recording
Introduction to Documentation and Reporting
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive and precise...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
