Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

08:05
A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
Punishment has a lasting impact on error-related brain activity
Anja Riesel1, Anna Weinberg, Tanja Endrass
1Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA. anja.riesel@hu-berlin.de
Psychophysiology
|November 19, 2011
Summary
Punishment lasting impacts brain error activity, especially in anxious individuals. This effect on the error-related neural activity (ERN) persisted even after punishment stopped, showing lasting learning.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Anxiety Research
Background:
- Error monitoring is crucial for adaptive behavior.
- Trait anxiety may influence how individuals process errors and punishment.
- The long-term effects of punishment on error processing remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the direct and lasting impact of punishment on error-related brain activity.
- To determine if trait anxiety moderates the effect of punishment on error monitoring.
- To explore punishment-based learning mechanisms in error processing.
Main Methods:
- Participants completed a flanker task with blocks of punishment and no punishment.
- Punishment was applied to errors during an acquisition phase and then withdrawn during an extinction phase.
- Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to measure the error-related negativity (ERN).
Main Results:
- The error-related negativity (ERN) was enhanced in punished blocks and remained elevated during extinction.
- This punishment-related ERN enhancement was stable across both acquisition and extinction phases.
- Higher trait anxiety correlated with larger punishment-related modulations of the ERN.
Conclusions:
- Punishment induces lasting changes in neural error monitoring.
- These punishment-based effects on the ERN are amplified by higher levels of trait anxiety.
- Findings suggest anxiety may be linked to overactive error monitoring through specific learning mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
Punishment
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Operant Conditioning
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Law of Effect
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Long-term Potentiation
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre- and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
Long-term Potentiation
Long-term potentiation, or LTP, is one of the ways by which synaptic plasticity—changes in the strength of chemical synapses—can occur in the brain. LTP is the process of synaptic strengthening that occurs over time between pre and postsynaptic neuronal connections. The synaptic strengthening of LTP works in opposition to the synaptic weakening of long-term depression (LTD) and together are the main mechanisms that underlie learning and memory.
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when presynaptic neurons...
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when presynaptic neurons...

