Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immunoinflammatory Mechanisms and Biocompatibility of Bioactive Dental Biomaterials: From Fundamental Insights to Clinical Translation.

Advanced healthcare materials·2026
Same author

Synergistic antibacterial effect of photocatalytic coatings activated by visible light and photodynamic therapy for rapid peri-implantitis treatment.

Bioactive materials·2026
Same author

A Humanized Bone Metastasis Model: <i>Ex Vivo</i> and <i>In Vivo</i> Applications.

Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods·2026
Same author

Inflammatory bone loss and signaling pathways in periodontitis: mechanistic insights and emerging therapeutic strategies.

Bone research·2026
Same author

Targeted Infection Control and Tissue Integration via pH-Sensitive Smart Coatings on Implant Surfaces.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
Same author

Harnessing Advances in Bone Tissue Engineering for Design of Bone-on-Chip Systems.

Advanced healthcare materials·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
07:12

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model

Published on: September 28, 2017

Bone formation analysis: effect of quantification procedures on the study outcome.

Marco A Lopez-Heredia1, Matilde Bongio, Vincent M J I Cuijpers

  • 1Department of Biomaterials, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Tissue Engineering. Part C, Methods
|November 22, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Histological procedures significantly impact bone regeneration measurements. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM-BS) and elastic van Gieson staining are recommended for accurate bone formation analysis.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance
06:54

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance

Published on: February 13, 2026

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
12:04

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography

Published on: December 9, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
07:12

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model

Published on: September 28, 2017

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance
06:54

Multimodal Approach to Assess Bone Regeneration and Scaffold Performance

Published on: February 13, 2026

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
12:04

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography

Published on: December 9, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Research
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Quantifying new bone formation is crucial for bone regeneration studies.
  • Histomorphometry using histological sections is a common assessment technique.
  • The influence of histological procedures on histomorphometry outcomes is under-examined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of different histological procedures on bone formation quantification.
  • To compare histomorphometry in plastic-embedded, paraffin-embedded, and scanning electron microscopy-backscattering mode (SEM-BS) specimens.
  • To identify optimal techniques for evaluating bone regeneration in tissue engineering.

Main Methods:

  • Histomorphometrical analysis of bone formation in guinea pig tibia intramedullary cavities filled with calcium phosphate cement.
  • Comparison of plastic-embedded, paraffin-embedded, and SEM-BS specimen analysis.
  • Evaluation of decalcified histological sections with elastic van Gieson staining.

Main Results:

  • The histological procedure significantly influenced the measured amount of bone.
  • High-resolution SEM-BS and elastic van Gieson staining of decalcified sections were identified as reliable techniques.
  • Plastic-embedded and paraffin-embedded methods showed variations in bone quantification.

Conclusions:

  • Histological preparation methods critically affect bone regeneration assessment.
  • Careful selection of analysis techniques based on scaffold characteristics is essential for bone tissue engineering studies.
  • SEM-BS and elastic van Gieson staining offer superior accuracy for bone formation evaluation.