Enteric neuromuscular pathology update

The recent development of consensus guidelines for the preparation and staining of tissues, the publication of the London Classification, and reviews of what is normal in the enteric neuromusculature have been significant steps forward in this field. Increased accessibility to full-thickness biopsies of the bowel wall facilitated by advances in laparoscopic surgery have also played a part in making the decision to ask for a tissue diagnosis easier. Better antibodies for immunohistochemistry and a better understanding of disease processes at work, such as those seen in filamin mutations, all help inform the range of information that can be gleaned from what is usually a very limited sample. Clinical phenotyping remains difficult in many patients, but the availability of specialist pathologic review and the standardization of staining between laboratories are leading to better defined histologic phenotypes, that inform, in turn, possible biological processes at work in these patients. In many instances, a diagnosis may come to light only after some time, and the retention of pathologic samples in paraffin wax, as is standard practice in most laboratories, is of great value in reassessing samples, often after many years, in the light of new advances. The highest quality information, and the best answer for the patient, is, as ever, achieved by close working relationships and excellent communication between clinicians and pathologists.