Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone vibrator placement and the cancellation technique.

J J Dempsey1, H Levitt

  • 1Department of Speech, Communication Sciences & Theater, St. John's University, Jamaica, New York.

Ear and Hearing
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of Hardwire Personal Assistive Listening Devices.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Field measurements of electromagnetic interference in hearing aids.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
Same author

Digital wireless telephones and hearing aids: new challenges for audiology.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
Same author

The nature of electromagnetic interference.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2001
Same author

Noise reduction in hearing aids: a review.

Journal of rehabilitation research and development·2001
Same author

The narrative processes coding system: research applications and implications for psychotherapy practice.

Journal of clinical psychology·2000
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles

Bone vibrator placement affects phase, not amplitude, in bone conduction sensitivity tests. Precise measurements are achievable using a cancellation technique, despite intersubject variations in phase response.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Bioacoustics
  • Hearing Science

Background:

  • Accurate bone conduction sensitivity measurement is crucial for diagnosing hearing loss.
  • Bone vibrator placement is a known source of variability in these measurements.
  • Standardized placement protocols are lacking, impacting test reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of bone vibrator position on the amplitude and phase of bone-conducted signals.
  • To evaluate the precision of a cancellation technique for bone conduction measurements.
  • To identify optimal bone vibrator placement for reliable audiometric testing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a cancellation technique to measure bone-conducted signals.
  • Compared bone vibrator placement at the center of the forehead.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Acoustically cancelled the bone vibrator signal with an earphone signal at equal amplitude and opposite phase.

    • Main Results:

    • Received signal amplitude showed no significant variation with bone vibrator position near the forehead center.
    • Received signal phase was highly sensitive to bone vibrator position.
    • Significant intersubject differences were observed in phase variation relative to vibrator position.

    Conclusions:

    • Bone vibrator position critically influences the phase, but not amplitude, of bone-conducted signals.
    • The cancellation technique offers high precision for bone conduction measurements.
    • Further research is needed to standardize bone vibrator placement for improved diagnostic accuracy.