Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

A Combined 3D Tissue Engineered In Vitro/In Silico Lung Tumor Model for Predicting Drug Effectiveness in Specific Mutational Backgrounds
Published on: April 6, 2016
Pharmacodynamic modeling of sequence-dependent antitumor activity of insulin-like growth factor blockade and
Amit Khatri1, Richard C Brundage, Jessica M Hull
1Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
Abstract:
Agents that block insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling are under investigation in clinical trials. Antitumor effects are likely to be enhanced when combined with other agents, but administration sequence effects on activity are not well-described. Three breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and Hs-578T) were treated with Gemcitabine and small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor cis-3-[3-(4-methyl-piperazin-l-yl)-cyclobutyl]1-(2-phenyl-quinolin-7-yl)-imidazo [1,5-a]pyrazin-8-ylamine (PQIP) as single agents and then in combination in the forward (Gemcitabine followed by PQIP) and reverse (PQIP followed by Gemcitabine) sequences. Antitumor effects were assessed longitudinally by Bayesian analysis using WinBUGS. The pharmacodynamic model adequately predicted the observed data. The differences in the cell-kill rate constants for the forward vs. reverse sequence ranged from 0.11 to 0.64 (day(-1)), and statistical significance was generally dependent on cell line and PQIP concentration. These data indicate that treatment with Gemcitabine first, followed by PQIP is superior to the reverse sequence in vitro.
Insights
Administering Gemcitabine before the small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor PQIP demonstrated superior in vitro antitumor effects compared to the reverse sequence. This finding is crucial for optimizing combination cancer therapy strategies.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology and Oncology
- Drug Combinations and Sequencing
Background:
- Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling inhibitors are in clinical trials for cancer treatment.
- Combination therapy may enhance antitumor effects, but optimal administration sequences are not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of administration sequence on the in vitro antitumor activity of Gemcitabine and a novel small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (PQIP).
- To compare the efficacy of a forward (Gemcitabine then PQIP) versus a reverse (PQIP then Gemcitabine) treatment sequence.
Main Methods:
- Three human breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, Hs-578T) were treated with Gemcitabine and PQIP as single agents and in combination.
- Combination treatments were administered in both forward and reverse sequences.
- Antitumor effects were assessed longitudinally using Bayesian analysis with WinBUGS for pharmacodynamic modeling.
Main Results:
- The pharmacodynamic model accurately predicted observed cell-kill data.
- Significant differences in cell-kill rate constants were observed between the forward and reverse sequences, ranging from 0.11 to 0.64 day(-1).
- The superiority of one sequence over the other was generally dependent on the specific cell line and PQIP concentration used.
Conclusions:
- The in vitro data strongly suggest that initiating treatment with Gemcitabine followed by PQIP is a more effective sequence than the reverse order.
- These findings provide critical insights for optimizing the clinical application of this combination therapy in breast cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview