Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

High Throughput SiRNA Screening for Chloropicrin and Hydrogen Fluoride-Induced Cornea Epithelial Cell Injury
Published on: June 16, 2018
Immunotoxicant screening and prioritization in the twenty-first century
1Cardiopulmonary and Immunotoxicology Branch, Environmental Public Health Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, USA.
Alternative in vitro assays offer a promising approach to reduce animal use in immunotoxicity testing for drugs and chemicals. These methods can screen for immunosuppression and allergic hypersensitivity more efficiently and cost-effectively.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology and Pharmacology
- Immunology
- In vitro assay development
Background:
- Current immunotoxicity testing relies on resource-intensive animal models for evaluating immune system effects of drugs, chemicals, and pesticides.
- Existing animal assays for biomarkers (e.g., lymphoid organ indices) and immune function (e.g., pathogen response) require specialized expertise and significant resources.
- There is a need for more efficient and cost-effective methods to assess immunotoxicity, reducing reliance on animal testing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the potential of alternative in vitro assays for detecting immunosuppression and allergic hypersensitivity.
- To evaluate how these alternative methods can reduce animal use and testing costs.
- To enhance the screening and prioritization of immunotoxic compounds.
Main Methods:
- In vitro assays targeting innate and adaptive immune cells and associated functional markers (gene expression, protein synthesis, proliferation) for immunosuppression.
- Alternative methods focusing on chemical properties and defined cell population activation for detecting skin sensitizers (allergic hypersensitivity).
- Development and validation of assays to assess specific modes of action for immune system modulation.
Main Results:
- Alternative in vitro assays demonstrate potential for detecting immunosuppression by assessing various immune cell functions and markers.
- Specific in vitro approaches effectively identify and estimate the potency of skin sensitizers, addressing allergic hypersensitivity.
- These alternative models show promise in reducing the need for animal-based immunotoxicity assessments.
Conclusions:
- Alternative in vitro assays provide a viable strategy to replace or supplement traditional animal testing for immunotoxicity.
- These methods offer increased efficiency, reduced costs, and improved screening capabilities for immunosuppression and allergic sensitization.
- Further development and validation of in vitro assays are crucial for their regulatory acceptance and widespread adoption in chemical safety assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Toxicity Testing in Animals

