Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Physiology of Emotion

Physiology of Emotion

The physiology of emotions is a multifaceted process involving the autonomic nervous system, brain structures, hormones, and neurotransmitters. This intricate interplay dictates how emotions manifest in the body and influence behavior.
Autonomic Nervous System
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a critical role in emotional responses by regulating involuntary physiological functions. It consists of two main components: the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. The sympathetic system...

Emotional Expression

Emotional Expression

Emotional expression encompasses how individuals convey their emotions through verbal communication and non-verbal cues. These non-verbal actions include facial expressions, body language, and physical gestures, such as frowning or smiling. Among these, facial expressions play a crucial role in emotional expression and are understood universally, indicating a biological basis for how humans communicate emotions.
Universal Facial Expressions
Psychologist Paul Ekman identified seven basic...

Physiological Theories: James-Lange Theory of Emotion

Physiological Theories: James-Lange Theory of Emotion

The James-Lange theory of emotion, proposed by William James and Carl Lange in the late 19th century, asserts that emotions are the result of physiological reactions to external stimuli. Contrary to the traditional view, which suggests that emotions directly arise from the perception of stimuli, this theory proposes that emotions occur as a consequence of the body's responses to such stimuli. According to this framework, an emotional experience is a cognitive interpretation of physiological...

Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion

Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion

Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer proposed the two-factor theory of emotion, which emphasizes the interplay between physiological arousal and cognitive labeling in forming emotional experiences. This theory suggests that emotions are not simply a result of physiological responses but rather a combination of these responses and the individual's cognitive interpretation of them.
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences physiological...

Physiological Theories: Cannon-Bard Theory of Emotion

Physiological Theories: Cannon-Bard Theory of Emotion

The Cannon-Bard theory of emotion, proposed by Walter Cannon and Philip Bard, challenges the notion that emotions are solely the result of physiological responses. Instead, this theory suggests that emotional experiences and physiological arousal occur simultaneously but operate through independent mechanisms. This dual response is initiated by the brain, specifically by the thalamus, which plays a critical role in processing sensory information.
Upon perceiving a stimulus, such as a dangerous...

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The eye, a spy hole on human mind: Spontaneous blink rate and amplitude, and their variability, as new psychobiological markers of anxiety.

PloS one·2025

Same author

Heart rate and EEG gamma band connectivity in the ventral attention network during emotional movie stimulation in women with high emotion dysregulation.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025

Same author

Emotional pictures in the brain and their interaction with the task: A fine-grained fMRI coordinate-based meta-analysis study.

NeuroImage·2024

Same author

Gender effect in affective processing: Alpha EEG source analysis on emotional slides and film-clips.

Psychophysiology·2024

Same author

fMRI fluctuations within the language network are correlated with severity of hallucinatory symptoms in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)·2023

Same author

Language Network Connectivity of Euthymic Bipolar Patients Is Altered at Rest and during a Verbal Fluency Task.

Biomedicines·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Published on: February 11, 2017

Gender differences in emotional responses: a psychophysiological study.

Marta Bianchin¹, Alessandro Angrilli

¹Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy.

Physiology & Behavior

|November 24, 2011

Summary

Women exhibit heightened physiological and cognitive responses to emotional stimuli compared to men. This suggests a biologically grounded greater sensitivity in women to adverse or stressful events.

More Related Videos

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood

Published on: February 11, 2017

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Psychology
Psychophysiology

Background:

Emotional responses exhibit significant gender-based variations.
Understanding these differences is crucial for mental health research.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate gender differences in emotional responses.
To explore physiological and cognitive correlates of these differences.

Main Methods:

Recruited 22 males and 21 females for emotional stimuli perception.
Recorded physiological data: Startle reflex, Evoked Potentials, Heart Rate, facial EMG, Skin Conductance.
Utilized standardized pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant slides.

Main Results:

Women showed larger startle reflex amplitude and greater startle emotion modulation.
Gender differences in Slow Evoked Potentials (400-800 ms) were observed in the left prefrontal cortex.
Women perceived slides as less pleasant and reported higher arousal to unpleasant stimuli.

Conclusions:

Results align with known functional brain differences between genders.
Suggests a biologically grounded greater sensitivity and vulnerability in women to adverse/stressful events.