Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention utilizing drug-eluting stents in patients with reduced left ventricular

Gabriel L Sardi1, Michael A Gaglia, Gabriel Maluenda

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Insights

Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increases the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with LVEF ≤40% face higher risks for ST and major adverse cardiac events.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Heart Failure

Background:

  • Depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in ischemic cardiomyopathy predicts mortality post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • The association between reduced LVEF and stent thrombosis (ST) or repeat revascularization requires further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between LVEF and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), specifically ST and target lesion revascularization (TLR), following PCI.
  • To identify patient subgroups with reduced LVEF who are at higher risk for adverse outcomes after PCI.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 5,377 patients undergoing PCI.
  • Multivariable Cox regression and competitive outcome analysis comparing LVEF categories (normal, mild, moderate, severe).
  • Evaluation of 1-year MACE (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ST, TLR) and individual endpoints of ST and TLR.

Main Results:

  • Lower LVEF was associated with increased MACE and ST risk. Patients with severely decreased LVEF had a significantly higher primary endpoint rate.
  • Moderate and severe LVEF decreases (LVEF ≤40%) were independently associated with MACE and ST.
  • Clinically driven TLR rates did not significantly differ across LVEF categories. Stent type (drug-eluting vs. bare-metal) did not impact ST probability.

Conclusions:

  • Reduced LVEF, particularly LVEF ≤40%, significantly increases the risk of stent thrombosis after PCI.
  • Patients with LVEF ≤40% may benefit from intensified interventional and pharmacologic strategies to mitigate ST risk.
  • LVEF is a crucial predictor of ST but not clinically driven TLR in the context of PCI.

Related Concept Videos

Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care01:27

Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

Interprofessional care for coronary artery disease includes pharmacological therapy and revascularization procedures.Pharmacological therapy for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) aims to manage symptoms, prevent complications, and improve patient outcomes through various classes of medications:Antiplatelet Agents:Aspirin and Clopidogrel: These medications inhibit platelet aggregation, preventing blood clots, which is crucial for avoiding heart attacks and strokes. Doctors often prescribe these...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care01:28

Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

IntroductionThe management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) aims to minimize myocardial damage, preserve myocardial function, and prevent complications.Initial ManagementInpatient management involves continuous cardiac monitoring, preferably in an ICU, focusing on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium, and creatinine levels, and urine output. Ongoing pharmacologic management is crucial for stabilizing the patient.Supplemental Oxygen: Administer supplemental oxygen if oxygen saturation is...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care01:27

Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is characterized by narrowed arteries that diminish blood flow to the extremities. Effective management of PAD requires an interprofessional approach involving various healthcare professionals. The critical aspects of interprofessional care for PAD patients focus on risk factor modification, drug therapy, exercise therapy, nutrition therapy, critical limb ischemia care, and interventional radiology and surgical procedures.The primary treatment goal for PAD...