Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention utilizing drug-eluting stents in patients with reduced left ventricular
Gabriel L Sardi1, Michael A Gaglia, Gabriel Maluenda
1Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Insights
Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increases the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with LVEF ≤40% face higher risks for ST and major adverse cardiac events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure
Background:
- Depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in ischemic cardiomyopathy predicts mortality post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- The association between reduced LVEF and stent thrombosis (ST) or repeat revascularization requires further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between LVEF and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), specifically ST and target lesion revascularization (TLR), following PCI.
- To identify patient subgroups with reduced LVEF who are at higher risk for adverse outcomes after PCI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 5,377 patients undergoing PCI.
- Multivariable Cox regression and competitive outcome analysis comparing LVEF categories (normal, mild, moderate, severe).
- Evaluation of 1-year MACE (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ST, TLR) and individual endpoints of ST and TLR.
Main Results:
- Lower LVEF was associated with increased MACE and ST risk. Patients with severely decreased LVEF had a significantly higher primary endpoint rate.
- Moderate and severe LVEF decreases (LVEF ≤40%) were independently associated with MACE and ST.
- Clinically driven TLR rates did not significantly differ across LVEF categories. Stent type (drug-eluting vs. bare-metal) did not impact ST probability.
Conclusions:
- Reduced LVEF, particularly LVEF ≤40%, significantly increases the risk of stent thrombosis after PCI.
- Patients with LVEF ≤40% may benefit from intensified interventional and pharmacologic strategies to mitigate ST risk.
- LVEF is a crucial predictor of ST but not clinically driven TLR in the context of PCI.
Abstract:
Ischemic cardiomyopathy with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is predictive of death after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but its association with stent thrombosis (ST) and the need for repeat revascularization is less clearly defined. In total 5,377 patients undergoing PCI were retrospectively evaluated. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and competitive outcome analysis were employed. The primary end point was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (all-cause death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, ST, and target lesion revascularization [TLR]). Individual end points of ST and of TLR were also evaluated. Patients with normal LVEF (>50%) were compared to those with mild (41% to 50%), moderate (25% to 40%), and severe (<25%) decreases in LVEF. Patients with abnormal LVEF were older and more commonly diabetic and had renal insufficiency and heart failure syndrome (p <0.001 for all variables). These patients demonstrated more angiographically complex lesions and less frequently received a drug-eluting stent. The primary end point was significantly increased in patients with lower LVEF (9.7% for normal LVEF vs 20.6% for severely decreased LVEF, p <0.001). ST occurred more frequently in these patients (1.4% for normal LVEF vs 6% for severely decreased LVEF, p <0.001), but clinically driven TLR did not significantly change across LVEF categories. After adjustment, only moderate and severe LVEF decreases (i.e., LVEF ≤40%) demonstrated an association with major adverse cardiac events and with the individual outcome of ST. Subgroup analysis of patients receiving only a drug-eluting stent or a bare-metal stent demonstrated no statistically significant differences for the probability of ST. In conclusion, decreased LVEF is not associated with clinically driven TLR but does increase the risk of ST. Patients with LVEF ≤40% appear to be at significantly higher risk for ST and therefore might benefit from interventional and pharmacologic strategies aimed at minimizing this risk.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
