Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test01:21

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Joint associations between gestational environmental chemical mixtures and child behavioral outcomes.

Environment internationalĀ·2026
Same author

Comparative discriminative performance of triglyceride-glucose derived composite indices and cholesterol-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol-glucose derived composite indices for identifying frailty: A cross-sectional study.

Science progressĀ·2026
Same author

Thrombocytopenia and anemia associated with piperacillin-tazobactam: integrating clinical case series with FAERS disproportionality analysis.

Frontiers in pharmacologyĀ·2026
Same author

Construction of multinomial distributions under mean constraints and its application in power analyses.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statisticsĀ·2025
Same author

Importance of social deprivation by neighborhood on the pathway from referral to kidney transplantation.

SurgeryĀ·2025
Same author

Functional mobility and pain are improved for 6 years after adolescent bariatric surgery.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)Ā·2025
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicineĀ·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicineĀ·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicineĀ·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicineĀ·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicineĀ·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicineĀ·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

Weighted multiple testing correction for correlated tests.

Changchun Xie1

  • 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. xiech@mcmaster.ca

Statistics in Medicine
|November 25, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new weighted multiple testing correction method for correlated endpoints in clinical trials. The method offers higher statistical power for all hypotheses compared to existing approaches, especially with high endpoint correlation.

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Statistical Significance

Background:

  • Clinical trials frequently involve multiple, correlated endpoints.
  • Existing methods for controlling family-wise type I error rate (FWER) often ignore endpoint correlations, potentially reducing statistical power.
  • Current methods like Bonferroni, Holm, and fixed-sequence procedures have limitations in handling correlations or computational complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel weighted multiple testing correction method designed for correlated endpoints.
  • To address the limitations of existing methods, particularly computational difficulties and suboptimal power.
  • To enhance the statistical power of hypothesis testing in clinical trials with multiple correlated endpoints.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a weighted multiple testing correction algorithm.
  • Utilized the 'mvtnorm' package in R for computational implementation, enabling scalability to numerous endpoints.
  • Comparative analysis through simulations against established methods like Flexible Fixed-Sequence (FFS) and Alpha-Exhaustive Fallback (AEF).

Main Results:

  • The proposed weighted method demonstrates higher power for the first hypothesis compared to FFS and AEF.
  • It retains the advantage of FFS and AEF by providing high power for subsequent hypotheses in the testing sequence.
  • Achieves superior power for individual hypotheses over the weighted Holm procedure, particularly when endpoint correlations are high.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed weighted multiple testing correction is an effective approach for correlated endpoints in clinical trials.
  • It offers improved statistical power across all tested hypotheses, surpassing existing methods.
  • The method's computational efficiency allows application to a large number of endpoints.