Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative evaluation of commercially available aflatoxin test methods.

D E Koeltzow1, S N Tanner

  • 1U.S. Department of Agriculture, Quality Assurance and Research Technical Center, Kansas City, MO 64195.

Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists
|July 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phage conversion of Shigella flexneri group antigens.

Infection and immunity·1975
Same author

Genetic transfer of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide antigens to Escherichia coli K-12.

Journal of bacteriology·1972
Same author

Structural heterogeneity in the lipopolysaccharide of Aerobacter aerogenes NCTC 243.

Biochemistry·1971
Same author

The lipopolysaccharides of Aerobacter aerogenes strains A3(S1) and NCTC 243.

Biochemistry·1968

Several methods for detecting aflatoxins in corn showed comparable performance to established techniques. These findings support the reliability of various analytical approaches for ensuring grain safety and compliance.

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Food Safety

Background:

  • Aflatoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by Aspergillus fungi, posing significant risks to human and animal health.
  • Accurate and reliable analytical methods are crucial for monitoring aflatoxin contamination in agricultural commodities like corn.
  • Established methods such as the Holaday-Velasco (HV) minicolumn and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) serve as benchmarks for aflatoxin analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance of five qualitative and one quantitative aflatoxin analytical methods against standard HV minicolumn and TLC methods.
  • To assess the reliability of these methods across multiple laboratories and diverse sample types.
  • To determine if newer methods offer statistically comparable results to established techniques for aflatoxin detection in corn.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving six laboratories, including USDA-FGIS, University of Georgia, and University of Arizona.
  • Analysis of artificially contaminated corn (with aflatoxin B1 and B2, or only B1) and naturally contaminated corn samples.
  • Testing across a range of total aflatoxin levels from 0 to 40 ppb, with specific concentrations including 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 ppb.

Main Results:

  • Chi-square analyses revealed no statistically significant difference in performance between the HV minicolumn and the Afla-20-Cup, Aflatest, EZ-Screen, OXOID, and SAM-A methods.
  • Agri-Screen method results were found to be statistically comparable to those obtained using thin-layer chromatography (TLC).
  • The study provides data on the performance of multiple aflatoxin detection methods under various conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The evaluated qualitative methods (Afla-20-Cup, Aflatest, EZ-Screen, OXOID, SAM-A) demonstrate performance comparable to the HV minicolumn for aflatoxin analysis in corn.
  • The Agri-Screen method is a viable alternative to TLC for aflatoxin detection in corn.
  • These findings support the use of multiple analytical methods for ensuring aflatoxin compliance in corn.