Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

Cochlear implantation: current and future device options.

Matthew L Carlson1, Colin L W Driscoll, René H Gifford

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
|November 26, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Cochlear implants offer excellent reliability and speech recognition in quiet. However, current designs struggle with complex sounds and patient performance varies, prompting research into improved hearing technologies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

NF2-related Schwannomatosis Diagnosed Before and After 30 Years of Age: Differences in Disease Presentation and Rates of Positive Genetic Testing.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2026
Same author

Present Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Lack of Auditory Sensation Through a Cochlear Implant After Vestibular Schwannoma Resection.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2026
Same author

Defining clinically significant tumor size in sporadic vestibular schwannoma to inform timing of radiosurgery during wait-and-scan management: further evidence supporting size threshold surveillance.

Journal of neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Long-term tumor control after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma.

Journal of neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Highly Coordinated Cochlear Implant Care With Remote Programming: Clinical, Financial, and Implementation Outcomes for the Complete Cochlear Implant Care (CCIC) Model.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2025
Same author

Impact of Vestibular Schwannoma Management on Cochlear Implant Programming and Outcomes.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Audiology and Bioengineering
  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Cochlear implant technology has advanced significantly, with most users achieving high speech recognition in quiet.
  • Despite successes, conventional cochlear implants lack the frequency resolution for complex auditory environments.
  • A subset of patients experiences poor outcomes, indicating limitations in current cochlear implant technology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a historical overview of cochlear implant development.
  • To review current cochlear implant systems from major manufacturers.
  • To examine strategies for enhancing cochlear implant performance and discuss future directions.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of cochlear implant technology evolution.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

  • Comparative analysis of current cochlear implant systems.
  • Examination of novel signal processing strategies.
  • Discussion of future research and development trends.

    • Main Results:

    • Most cochlear implant users demonstrate high speech recognition in quiet settings.
    • Current devices exhibit limitations in frequency resolution for complex listening.
    • Significant performance variability exists among cochlear implant recipients.
    • Ongoing research focuses on addressing these limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • Cochlear implants have achieved remarkable success but require further innovation.
    • Improved frequency resolution and strategies to mitigate performance variability are critical.
    • Future developments aim to enhance the auditory experience for all cochlear implant users.