Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and validation of a real-time RT-qPCR assay for the detection of citrus yellow vein clearing virus.

Plant disease·2026
Same author

Factors Affecting South and East Asian Immigrants' Access to Mental Health Services in Canada: A Scoping Review.

Journal of immigrant and minority health·2025
Same author

Genetic Analysis of the Emerging Citrus Yellow Vein Clearing Virus Reveals a Divergent Virus Population in American Isolates.

Plant disease·2023
Same author

Investigation of the EHV-1 Genotype (N<sub>752</sub>, D<sub>752</sub>, and H<sub>752</sub>) in Swabs Collected From Equids With Respiratory and Neurological Disease and Abortion From the United States (2019-2022).

Journal of equine veterinary science·2023
Same author

A novel approach for simultaneous detection of the most common food-borne pathogens by multiplex qPCR.

Biomolecules & biomedicine·2023
Same author

Genome assembly and association tests identify interacting loci associated with vigor, precocity, and sex in interspecific pistachio rootstocks.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Automating Citrus Budwood Processing for Downstream Pathogen Detection Through Instrument Engineering
11:30

Automating Citrus Budwood Processing for Downstream Pathogen Detection Through Instrument Engineering

Published on: April 21, 2023

Comparative procedures for sample processing and quantitative PCR detection of grapevine viruses.

Fatima Osman1, Tammi Olineka, Emir Hodzic

  • 1Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Journal of Virological Methods
|November 26, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Optimizing grapevine RNA virus detection involves thorough tissue homogenization and DNase treatment. Magnetic bead-based RNA extraction and One Step RT-qPCR offer superior sensitivity and efficiency for accurate virus quantification.

More Related Videos

Quantification of Adeno-Associated Viral Genomes in Purified Vector Samples by Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction
04:43

Quantification of Adeno-Associated Viral Genomes in Purified Vector Samples by Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction

Published on: October 11, 2024

Localization and Quantification of Begomoviruses in Whitefly Tissues by Immunofluorescence and Quantitative PCR
06:25

Localization and Quantification of Begomoviruses in Whitefly Tissues by Immunofluorescence and Quantitative PCR

Published on: February 8, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Automating Citrus Budwood Processing for Downstream Pathogen Detection Through Instrument Engineering
11:30

Automating Citrus Budwood Processing for Downstream Pathogen Detection Through Instrument Engineering

Published on: April 21, 2023

Quantification of Adeno-Associated Viral Genomes in Purified Vector Samples by Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction
04:43

Quantification of Adeno-Associated Viral Genomes in Purified Vector Samples by Digital Droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction

Published on: October 11, 2024

Localization and Quantification of Begomoviruses in Whitefly Tissues by Immunofluorescence and Quantitative PCR
06:25

Localization and Quantification of Begomoviruses in Whitefly Tissues by Immunofluorescence and Quantitative PCR

Published on: February 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Plant virology
  • Molecular diagnostics
  • Agricultural biotechnology

Background:

  • Accurate detection of grapevine RNA viruses is crucial for disease management and preventing economic losses.
  • Existing methods for sample processing, RNA extraction, and quantitative PCR (qPCR) vary in efficiency and sensitivity.
  • Standardization of these techniques is needed to improve diagnostic reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare different methods for tissue homogenization, RNA extraction, and qPCR-based detection of grapevine RNA viruses.
  • To identify the most effective combination of techniques for sensitive and reliable virus quantification.
  • To optimize diagnostic protocols for grapevine virus detection.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of semi-automated and automated tissue homogenization techniques (e.g., Tissue Lyser) on grapevine petioles and cambial tissues.
  • Evaluation of four automated nucleic acid extraction platforms against a commercial kit (RNeasy plant extraction kit) for viral RNA recovery.
  • Comparative analysis of quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods: One Step RT-qPCR, Two Step RT-qPCR, and low-density array (LDA) detection.

Main Results:

  • Thorough homogenization using the Tissue Lyser and DNase digestion of purified RNA significantly improved virus detection and lowered quantitation cycle (Cq) values.
  • Magnetic bead-based RNA extraction methods demonstrated superior efficiency compared to other tested extraction techniques.
  • One Step RT-qPCR yielded the lowest Cq values, indicating higher sensitivity for grapevine virus detection compared to Two Step RT-qPCR and LDA.

Conclusions:

  • Effective tissue homogenization and DNase treatment are critical for enhancing grapevine RNA virus detection sensitivity.
  • Magnetic bead-based RNA extraction platforms provide efficient and reliable viral RNA recovery from infected grapevine tissues.
  • One Step RT-qPCR is the most sensitive method among those evaluated for the accurate quantification of grapevine RNA viruses.