Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of methods for checking surgical margins.

R P Rapini1

  • 1Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
|August 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating surgical margins for cutaneous neoplasms involves vertical, horizontal, and oblique sectioning methods. No single method is perfect for assessing tumor margins and their relationship to the neoplasm.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Verrucous eyebrows: a cutaneous manifestation of a systemic disease.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2017
Same author

Urticating Hashimoto-Pritzker Langerhans cell histiocytosis.

Pediatric dermatology·2001
Same author

Silicone auricular prosthesis.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2000
Same author

Spitz nevus or melanoma?

Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery·1999
Same author

Oral melanoma: diagnosis and treatment.

Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery·1998
Same author

"New" diseases in dermatopathology.

Advances in dermatology·1997

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Surgical Pathology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Accurate evaluation of surgical margins is critical for effective treatment of cutaneous neoplasms.
  • Various sectioning techniques exist, each with unique advantages and limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare and contrast seven different methods for evaluating surgical margins of cutaneous neoplasms.
  • To identify the strengths and weaknesses of each margin assessment technique.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of vertical (perpendicular), horizontal (parallel), and oblique (Mohs method) sectioning techniques.
  • Analysis of 'breadloaf' and 'breadloaf-cross' methods for vertical sectioning.
  • Evaluation of peripheral (perimeter) sectioning methods.

Main Results:

  • Peripheral sectioning methods evaluate nearly 100% of the margin but do not clearly show tumor-margin relationship.
  • Vertical transverse sections clearly demonstrate the tumor's relationship to the margin.
  • No single method was found to be universally superior or perfect for margin evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of surgical margin evaluation technique depends on the specific clinical scenario and desired information.
  • A combination of methods may be necessary for comprehensive margin assessment.
  • Further research may be needed to optimize margin evaluation strategies for cutaneous neoplasms.

Related Experiment Videos