Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Variation01:19

Variation

An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Introduction to Normal Distributions01:29

Introduction to Normal Distributions

Standardized test scores often follow a symmetric distribution that can be modeled with the normal distribution, a fundamental concept in statistics. This distribution is particularly useful for interpreting test performance fairly across populations, as it provides a mathematical framework for understanding variability and central tendency in large datasets.From Histogram to Frequency DistributionRaw test data are often displayed using histograms, where the height of each bar represents the...
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Mean Absolute Deviation01:13

Mean Absolute Deviation

The mean absolute deviation is also a measure of the variability of data in a sample. It is the absolute value of the average difference between the data values and the mean.
Let us consider a dataset containing the number of unsold cupcakes in five shops: 10, 15, 8, 7, and 10. Initially, calculate the sample mean. Then calculate the deviation, or the difference, between each data value and the mean. Next, the absolute values of these deviations are added and divided by the sample size to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dopamine abrogates immunosuppression mediated by PD-L1 of cancer stem cells in a preclinical triple-negative breast cancer model.

Acta pharmacologica Sinica·2026
Same author

PK/PD modeling of the effect of Escitalopram combined with Docetaxel in the treatment of breast cancer with depression in mice.

Journal of pharmaceutical sciences·2025
Same author

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of human interferon-α2b spray in healthy participants.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2025
Same author

Modeling exposure-driven adverse events of EGFR TKIs in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Acta pharmacologica Sinica·2025
Same author

Model-based analysis for investigating the impact of tumor size, lymphocyte and neutrophil on the survival of breast cancer 4T1 tumor-bearing mice.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2024
Same author

Longitudinal and time-to-event modeling for the survival of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients.

Acta pharmacologica Sinica·2024
Same journal

[The protective effects of curcumin loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles on rat cardiomyocytes].

Yao xue xue bao = Acta pharmaceutica Sinica·2018
Same journal

[Identification of water buffalo horn and its adulterants using COI barcode].

Yao xue xue bao = Acta pharmaceutica Sinica·2018
Same journal

[Construction of the brain-targeting drug carrier through imprinting of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor α7].

Yao xue xue bao = Acta pharmaceutica Sinica·2018
Same journal

[Application of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in magnetic resonance / photothermal dual-modal imaging].

Yao xue xue bao = Acta pharmaceutica Sinica·2018
Same journal

[Endocytosis pathway and intracellular distribution of heparosan].

Yao xue xue bao = Acta pharmaceutica Sinica·2018
Same journal

[On-line detection of concentration process of Ganmaoling granules by near infrared spectroscopy combined with automatic control system].

Yao xue xue bao = Acta pharmaceutica Sinica·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

[Comparison study of model evaluation methods: normalized prediction distribution errors vs. visual predictive

Yu-peng Ren1, Chen-hui Deng, Xi-pei Wang

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.

Yao Xue Xue Bao = Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica
|November 30, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE) and visual predictive checks (VPC) for model evaluation. NPDE proved more robust across different study designs, offering reliable statistical testing where VPC struggled.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacometrics
  • Statistical modeling
  • Clinical trial design

Background:

  • Model evaluation is crucial in pharmacometrics.
  • Normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE) and visual predictive checks (VPC) are common methods.
  • Their performance can vary with different study designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of NPDE and VPC in model evaluation.
  • To assess their reliability under various simulated study designs.
  • To determine the suitability of each method for different clinical data scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation studies were used to generate data from 'false' models.
  • Model performance was evaluated using both NPDE and VPC.
  • Simulations included single and multiple dosing regimens with varied sampling times.
  • Biased parameter typical values and inter-individual variability were introduced.

Main Results:

  • Visual predictive checks (VPC) lacked clear statistical tests and were difficult to interpret with multiple doses and varied sampling times.
  • Normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE) had corresponding statistical tests.
  • Study design factors did not significantly impact NPDE results.
  • NPDE demonstrated robustness across different simulated study designs.

Conclusions:

  • NPDE is a more reliable method for model evaluation compared to VPC, especially under complex study designs.
  • NPDE provides statistically sound assessments that are less influenced by study design variations.
  • NPDE can be effectively used for evaluating clinical data and models where VPC is not suitable.